Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't fly, can't go by train, not cycling today, but would be prepared to go on a short car journey. I drove during the 1987 storms blissfully unaware that they were the worst in a century, everyone seemed to have a chain saw in deepest darkest Kent.


I'd avoid a longer car journey due to the likelihood of disruption. Worst thing in 1987 was getting fuel as most forecourts were closed due to power cuts. The good chainsaw gangs were great in Kent for clearing roads of fallen trees - much worse than today I expect as it had been so long since we'd had a good storm, and worse as the leaves were still on the trees meaning more wind damage.


Would I have driven in 87 knowing how bad the storms were? It wasn't the eye of the storm, which was overnight, and of course being much younger I was much less risk averse.


In the same decade living in Oxfordshire, I gave up cycling one day to motorcycle into work. Cyclists were leaning into the wind, coming to a wind break, and falling over under their own force. I have the opposite some mornings when I cycle onto a bridge over the Thames.


Rumour has it that Southwark Council are responsible for today's bad weather

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a flat fee levy payable by guests staying in hotel and hostel rooms, so added to the bill.  This already happens in Manchester and Liverpool ( I think in Liverpool it’s a percentage, so the more expensive rooms pay more). I read somewhere that Edinburgh is doing this next year? Charges of this kind are becoming common around the world. I think it absolutely makes sense for Southwark and other boroughs are bound to follow.
    • In  parts of Europe you just get charged tax at the end of your stay somewhere. Usually a couple of quid added to your bill. Most tourists are pretty happy to stump up the cost, as it's an expected expense.  I  think it's a good way to make money and remove the burden from locals.  It's for foreigners, Sue - I'm sure Londoners and brits will still be able to freely cross the borough lines without having to go through checkpoint charlie 🙂 
    • It doesn't work like that. There won't be differential pricing for tourists and residents at any attractions, no checkpoints nor a requirement to carry one's papers with one at all times. A levy is put on hotels, maybe on Air B&Bs, on a bed per night basis. That cash goes to Southwark. It's pretty easy to administer.
    • Don't see an issue at all. Sounds like the protest is being made by friends and families of the two off licences, Morleys, pret and maxim chicken who are within 100 m of the school. Much ado about nothing. Besides if it doesn't proceed, the kids will walk a but further!!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...