Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the-e-dealer wrote:

> It appears The photo was a way to trick us into publicising the scummy edl.

> No interest was shown in an edittedphoto to help the collection of evidence. We need to be vigilant.

> Thanks to quick admin for removing.


I didn't see anything in the post or in the poster's (ChainshotCannon) history to lead me to that conclusion. I didn't experience the handwritten note that had been stuck up inside a lift in the block of flats, or the photo of it that was posted here, as inflammatory or propagandic, though I did wonder at the perceived need for posting about it. There are plenty of other instances of flyposting and unpermitted advertising that I'd happily see prosecuted, but this single notice in a lift seemed to me more evidence of the unhappiness of the person who produced it than of anything else, and I doubt that any heavyhanded anti-racist action, via the police or otherwise, is to any point.


I see that several of the poster's other posts seem now to have been deleted, and hope that 'vigilance' has not been overdone. Whatever I've missed, I hope that someone will post details of the actual evidence that it was a trick.

I dunno , it was hardly a piece of great propaganda, illiterate prejudice idiots just showing themselves up doesn't strike me as that bad even if it's offensive - like when that one eyed tosser Griffin went on QT, if only they'd let him talk more of his drivel.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hope you are right and that op did it

> unwittingly. Anyway its gone now lets hope we can

> avoid anymore such stuff appearing here.


You accused the original poster, ChainshotCannon, of publishing a photo here as "a way to trick us into publicising the scummy edl."


If, an hour later, you apparently concede that you don't truly know or believe that , you should have the decency and integrity to explicitly withdraw your allegation and apologise.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No interest was shown in an edittedphoto to help

> the collection of evidence.


You take the poster's not taking you up on the offer of a PM as evidence of his guilt? That's akin to calling a woman a lesbian because she doesn't want you to touch her arse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So your remedy for anyone harming an animal, amongst which I assume you include at least all insects, is, well, to kill an animal. Good and logical call. Hyperbole only gets you so far, you know. 
    • Hello, just wondered if you found anything? I'm also looking for a studio space, perhaps sharing. 
    • From what I have gathered from Bradbury Oak residents  I have spoken with, that at a meeting with RNIB earlier in the year, none of the residents were in favour of new build. There is the implication that rent rises are anticipated to help towards building costs. Rent is currently in the region of £300 pw - as with most sheltered housing (council and Housing Association), Since these rents also include maintenance charges, utility charges - Housing Benefit is only applicable to the actual 'rent element' per flat.
    • At the Dulwich Hill SNT meeting last night we spoke about Met. Engage. Dulwich Hill had signed up 185 households. Scheme  had been trialled in other parts of the country successfully and now the Met. Police are rolling it out, To the end of August, the Met Police had gathered 17,000 registrations which equites to 2% of households.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...