Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A random question for local historians out there. I was having a browse around the wonderful Aerial Photo Explorer: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/archive/collections/aerial-photos/ and found this 1946 RAF shot of Dog Kennel Hill/Dulwich Hamlet etc: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/archive/collections/aerial-photos/record/RAF_106G_UK_1356_V_5165

If you zoom in to Champion Hill at the top of the image, there is what appears to be a large aeroplane in the front garden of a house. The house no longer exists, but the location roughly corresponds with the Langford Green estate.

Anyone have any insight as to what this might have been? A downed German bomber, perhaps?

Looks like quite a grand house with a long oval drive. Maybe you could find who the house belonged to. Kelly's directory? Census?


The plane does look like it's been placed like a post war trophy/exhibit in the middle of the drive.

I think that's right, Durlstone Manor Hotel itself is on the other leg of Champion Hill just around the corner. The building is still there and very secluded opposite the building, formerly The Plantanes, now part of Kings College Hospital.


When does your map date from? I attach a screenshot from a map surveyed in 1949 which shows the South Lodge at some stage was renamed The Cottage.

A couple of small ads featuring the residence from the BNA:


TO BE SOLD.—GREY COB MARE , quiet in double or single harness, and quiet to ride. Price moderate—Apply to COACHMAN, South Lodge, Champion Hill, S.E.

Sporting Life - 22 Oct 1883


Recently Proved Wills

Mr Charles Goddard Clarke, M.P. for Peckham, South Lodge, Champion Hill, ?28,227

Various - July 1908

The map was from 1946.


I found this article in The Telegraph if anyone has access


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/property/4809747/From-the-manor-torn.html


Says the Kleinwort Benson banking family built it as a rural retreat and then the Colman's mustard family so there would probably be an archive somewhere to explain the plane.


Maybe preston_johns OP should retitle the thread Durlestone Manor South Lodge aeroplane and see if anyone who knows the story recognises the place

Just found this in my research too.


Who'd have thought the green cross code man aka Darth Vader, was in north cross road in 1975


https://www.layersoflondon.org/map/records/green-cross-code-man-filmed-in-north-cross-rd-1975/gallery/1


Wow @preston_johns, you have really good eyesight! What a great find. The house is South Lodge and we know a little about it but not who was living there in 1946 and why they had a plane parked out front! @Moovart, it wasn't built for the Kleinworts, though they did live in several houses in the area, see here https://www.dulwichsociety.com/the-journal/autumn-2014/the-germans-of-champion-hill-by-sharon-o-connor but it does have a German connection (so many Germans lived in this area) as its first known resident was George Egmont Bieber who lived here while he built The Platanes, a huge house which he later sold to Herman Kleinwort. Kleinwort later gave it to King's College Hospital because he couldn't sell it - it's still there on Champion Hill. South Lodge was later leased by Charles Goddard Clarke, MP for Peckham (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Goddard_Clarke). @Jenijenjen, we think The Cottage was a separate house. We don't know who lived in South Lodge in 1946 (or 45 Champion Hill as I think it was by then) but will add it to the to-do list for a trip to Southwark Archives, but in 1939 Ethel & Jeffrey Drake, he was a BBC TV engineer, lived here, as did two nurses, Barbara Smith and Jean Menzies. Of course, a neighbour could have been borrowing that large drive but where was the runway?! Perhaps on the fields across the road that had been used for silent movies before WW1 and was also home to Dulwich Hamlet FC?
I suspect it was a ?prop? used for fundraising efforts like The Spitfire Fund. During the war, local fundraising days often featured a ?plane? as a big attraction to help fill the collecting buckets. Maybe it was just parked there when the need passed.
Interesting about the Spitfire Funds! Looks quite Spitfirey or Hurricaney, but could be a German plane, if this pic of a fundraiser in Dudley is anything to go by... https://www.expressandstar.com/news/nostalgia/2020/07/10/how-the-west-midlands-reached-for-the-skies-with-spitfire-funds/
Thanks for all these updates and theories. It does look like a light bomber, with a wingspan that excedes the width of the double-fronted South Lodge. I like the fundraising idea, but it does look more Axis than Allied. Someone said Dornier Do 17, which would seem to fit quite well (wingspan c18m). So fundraising for what?

Pure guesswork on my part but could the fact that these are RAF photos of the late 40s be at the root of this mystery? At that time(before satellite photography)aerial photos taken from planes would be examined by eye for hostile military installations, troop movements, airfields etc. Those examining these photos would need to be trained. Could it be that there was no plane but that it is a plant to be found (or missed) by the trainee spotters? As such, it was perhaps superimposed on the photo, painted onto the negative or however such things were then achieved, for training purposes; the enemy plane hiding in plain sight. It would need to be placed on a big enough piece of land but not where it would easily stand out, like the middle of Kennington Oval or the boating lake in the park, a villa's carriage drive being ideal. Just a thought.


Another possibility occurring to me was that it might a dummy (inflatable? or partly so?). A lot of dummy aircraft were positioned around England during WW2 to confuse German spotter planes as to the disposition of Allied airbases and reserve fleets. Columns of inflatable and mock up tanks were also common, particularly in north Africa. There must have been many surplus dummies knocking about in 1946. Quite why one might end up in this garden is another thing.

I like your theory that it is an image put on the photo for training purposes. It has more logic than the other explanation of being an actual aircraft or a mock up for fundraising purposes. If that was the case it would have been placed in a much more prominent location.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I do hope NOT. He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
    • Nope, I'd just get on with my day and forget about it. And I wouldn't report them on the basis that they might spill my coffee in the future.  However the OP seems to think that this young woman is deliberately pushing her bell, slamming her gate etc, having repeatedly been asked not to. I'd wager the woman is a bit pee'd off and there's a bit of a stand-off going on. Best course of action is to go out, take the parcel, smile sweetly, say hello, tell her you hope she's having a nice day / staying cool etc, in a way that comes across as genuine and not pass-agg,  and to let it diffuse. Might find it calms down a bit.  But I like the girl hate the idea of her being denigrated on here when she works so hard. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...