Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've recently been re-watching House of Cards again, just finished the first series, and I've got to say it was a brilliant show, particualrly that first series (Now I know that Kevin Spacey became persona non-gratia...but that doesn't erase his brilliant performances as Frank Underwood). But as the show dragged on (even before the spacey news blew up) the show went downhill, particularly from about season 3....and sort of faded off into obscurity. Going from a show that everyone was talking about to one where most people I know haven't even seen the last series....


Anyway...got me thinking about shows that started off absolutely brilliantly, but then just ended poorly, or limped along for ages never quite recapturing their appeal....some obvious series that come to mind...


The Walking Dead - nothing was ever the same as series 1 for mine, but for a few series it held its own and was the biggest show on TV for a few years in the US.....now season 11 is so poorly written, its almost unwatchable and highly laughable in places....


Game of Thrones - as has been well commented on in social and mainstream media alive...after the showrunners were forced to move ahead of the source material, what was the biggest show on TV (probably globally) torched its legacy with the last 2 series....rushing the whole thing to a conclusion thus leaving the viewer relatively unstaisifed with the 'payoff' after years of careful build-up


After Life - the concept behind a black comedy about a main greiving for his wife was a clever blend of emtion and comedy, and Rickey Gervais shows always have some brilliantly funny, quirky characters. But now in its 3rd (and final) season, there's only so many times I can watch a man drinking wine and wallowing watching videos of his dead wife..the idea was a one series idea for mine.


On the flip side...for me series that managed to maintain quality (for the most part anyway, there's always gonna be a couple of weak episodes) for their entire run.....Breaking Bad (in fact the first series was probably the worst, so a bit the opposite!) and The Sopranos....


Any other thoughts from the crowd? On shows that started strong and faded Just a bit of fun...no judgement on anyone's tastes in TV shows please:)

Went bad - The West Wing.

Never really survived the loss of Aaron Sorkin, though it tried. To be fair he never delivered a script on time or within budget plus there were myriad other tensions behind the scenes so it?s understandable that they parted ways. But even before that ratings were slipping, and it never quite lived up to the initial promise. It?s like it couldn?t decide if it was a political drama, personal soap opera or some kind of procedural. By the end so of the plot lines were just odd.


Stayed excellent - The Wire.

One of the best bits of TV to come out of the noughties. Still holds its own today. But then David Simon is a superb writer who understood the source material like no one else. Even the slightly crazy McNulty plot line of season 5 works.

I didn't bother with the third and now fourth series of Killing Eve. Worth checking out?


Similarly I've given up on Peaky Blinders.


It was criminal that Homeland continued after series 2.


Lots of comedies that jumped the shark, obviously Happy Days, also Roseanne and Frasier. Before my time the later series of steptoe

Good shout on Homeland. With the end of Damien Lewis's storyline, so should the show have ended.


And speaking of lewis....I'd add Billions to the list. First season or two were great. Now its so convoluted, with the characters becoming comic book caricatures of their former selves....i've tried twice to recommit to keep watching...and have twice failed....

Dexter definitely qualifies - the later series weren?t bad but it peaked with season 4 ( I haven?t seen the recent revival).

I tend to think there?s so much money in successful US shows that there?s a big incentive to keep them going even when the writers have run out of ideas. An exception: The Good Wife. I recently rewatched all seven seasons (my partner hadn?t seen it) and that stayed brilliant all the way through.

> Went bad - The West Wing. Never really survived

> the loss of Aaron Sorkin, though it tried.


Folk interested in Aaron Sorkin might be interested in John Wilson's recent radio interview with him, in his This Cultural Life series, https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00161mc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Moving into a new place and need both a wardrobe and a chest of drawers, ideally collection Friday. Thanks!
    • Lordship Lane has two dry cleaners, three pizza places and an Italian selling pizza, two burger places, three bakeries, two hardware (ish, I'm thinking AJ Farmer here), God knows how many coffee and charity shops, two Italians, three nail salons, five wine shops... Where was the abject outrage when Dynamic Vines opened up literally next door to Cave de Bruno? But I don't see his customers decamped next door - no, those stalwarts are still out in force every night.  In Roman times all businesses were clustered by product. It's what kept prices down. Same in any market you go to abroad, they're all selling the same things next to each other.  Why is everyone being so hard on this new place? It's called healthy competition - you can't curtail the expansion of your business on the basis you that might hurt someone else's. 
    • I have a new fixation so any available, please let me know.  Thanks.
    • In restaurant terms I would say a chain manifests when the motivation is no longer “we are a couple/small group who have an idea and love food” who open a restaurant, them another and then a few more BUT THEN PIVOT to “we need capital to rollout out new restaurants so we have leveraged the help of the following investors”  that is the moment it stops being about the chef/food on the plate and becomes about the spreadsheet  so it is POSSIBLE  for a restaurant to have 50 branches and not be a chain - but I can’t think of any  I don’t know chango - by based on the number of outlets they appear to have just crossed/or are about to cross that line 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...