Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Maybe... or maybe articles like this are generally written by people who aren't from London, live in Zone 2 and have never spent much time in Croydon, Enfield or Bromley. I expect this 'hot-take' might read quite differently if that were so.

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> articles like this are generally

> written by people who aren't from London,


Yes - the way he describes Peckham as a black neighbourhood being gentrified by white people shows he doesn't know anything about Peckham. But otherwise his catty thumbnail sketches are pretty on the button IMHO (in my heterosexual opinion).

Long ago ED was quite working class and then became the faintest of faintly bohemian (Tony Blair just voted in, Grace and Favour and Blue Mountain opened, lots of independent shops, bric a brac places etc..) but swifly morphed into nappy valley as new property hungry mummies and daddies swept in from Putney, Battersea etc.. Now it is totally MOR and as the chains continue to move in I think it could end up utterly suburban and boring and soooo heterosexual.


Bellenden now is a bit what ED used to be like, back in the day.

There was a time when the Grasshopper pub and nightclub at Westerham was cited by a tabloid as the place to go for swingers. Did wonders for their takings as hordes of single lads descended on it for a while.


That's as outer London as you could get.


Guess with all the young wealthy families here, as first mate pointed out, we will have to wait a few more years till their kids are old enough for their parents to go wild and explore their chained up sexuality to make ED swing again 😉

Just saw this on the BBC news everso slightly related but the expression WTF comes to mind


BBC News - Car insurer Geico may have to pay $5m after woman contracts STI in a vehicle

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61763333

Dulwich is definitely going through another change with an influx of folks who can afford the ludicrous house prices. To be honest definitely losing the bohemian vibe of 15 years ago as the creatives, media types and artists are gradually being replaced by bankers and other loaded types. And I fear Lordship Lane is starting to reflect this.

There have been layers of gentrification similar to an archaeological dig. In the mid to late 1990s, those with more imagination than money discovered the pleasures of East Dulwich and took the plunge to move south of the river introducing a ?bohemian? vibe. More interesting shops moved into shop premises left empty by the exodus of butchers and greengrocers in the wake of the arrival of Sainsburys.


Ten years or so later, gentrification of the area had become established and some of the early trailblazers cashed in their chips to move to pastures new, East Dulwich became ED and the area had become more vibrant but less quirky (for want of a better word). This era saw the founding of the East Dulwich Forum and later the opening of the Picturehouse. Little jewellery shops began to open and more estate agents. One thread on this forum that comes to mind from this time complained about the ?chavs? that had begun to appear around the EDT.


Then a few years ago, the current era described by Rockets started. Shop landlords became greedy, more and more loft extensions were/are being built and wealth has become the dominant factor rather than imagination. But East Dulwich is still a pleasant place to live, with its parks and lively high street. The changes that have taken place here have taken place elsewhere and are not separate from the wider political/social climate. East Dulwich still has a good vibe but then it always did - it really wasn?t as down at heel and rough as some newcomers seem to believe prior to gentrification!

You can probably track the gentrification of the area via the Famous People Spotted in Sainsbrys thread.


Started with the likes of Jo Brand, Micky Flanagan and Timothy Spall, moved to some of the McGann brothers, James Nesbitt and Iain Glenn, then Kate Thornton and now Olivia Coleman, Jason Statham and Rosie Huntington-Whiteley!

what does that mean? started with? Are you suggesting a gradual improvement in the quality of our 'celebrities'?

That's very rude.


Some of the names above have lived here for a long time.

I very much doubt Jason Statham has thought "ooh, east dulwich is on the up, I must move there"....

There are many other reasons people live in an area.


Who would be the ultimate celeb to watch out for in Sainsbury Dog Kennel Hill - so we know when ED has "arrived"?

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Who would be the ultimate celeb to watch out for

> in Sainsbury Dog Kennel Hill - so we know when ED

> has "arrived"?


Has to be her Majesty and a pack of corgies

Jenijenjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Olivia Colman moved to this area in 2011 and has

> now left us for Norfolk.

>

> ETA and Jason Statham and Rosie

> Huntington-Whiteley live in Chelsea


Angelina - it was a joke, playing on the fact that we have had everyone from comedians through Oscar winners and one of Hollywood's leading earners.


Jason Statham and Rosie H-W do live in Dulwich (maybe their place in Dulwich is their second house in the country!! ;-)).


Probably the most famous/infamous was The Iron Lady herself but I doubt any of us would have welcomed her, or seen her, in Sainsbury's during her time as a Dulwich resident - I did, whilst working a Saturday job as a teenager deliver some pine furniture to Maggie's neighbours house - the security to get onto the gated houses was, understandably, ludicrous!

Lets go for mine; Crouch End (scary in its way but a mate liked it), Canary Wharf (Macho), Barnet (Some nice pubs but its not the south).


The worst Gentrification has to be Elephant Park - rather than a gradual gentrification that was a big bang.

Jenijenjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> East Dulwich still has a good vibe but then it

> always did - it really wasn?t as down at heel and

> rough as some newcomers seem to believe prior to

> gentrification!



I've always liked East Dulwich through all its incarnations, but I think it WAS pretty down at heel and rough, certainly around 1990.


There were no decent pubs (and some had frequent fights), there were shops with things like old prams outside (for sale, not customers' prams!), there were no nice places to have a cup of coffee until Blue Mountain opened, and then Grace and Favour opposite which used to include a sort of tea shop, if memory serves.


It's always been a great place to live though, because of the woods and the parks nearby.

Yeah, 1990 ED was not the flashiest of neighbourhoods, by a country mile !

There was easy aggro in the pubs around here, Foresters, Palmerston.

None of my mates would come down here for the weekend, let alone a night, felt safer up Northside.

Loved it though, and as Sue says, all the versions of ED have had their plus-sides.


Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenijenjen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > East Dulwich still has a good vibe but then it

> > always did - it really wasn?t as down at heel

> and

> > rough as some newcomers seem to believe prior

> to

> > gentrification!

>

>

> I've always liked East Dulwich through all its

> incarnations, but I think it WAS pretty down at

> heel and rough, certainly around 1990.

>

> There were no decent pubs (and some had frequent

> fights), there were shops with things like old

> prams outside (for sale, not customers' prams!),

> there were no nice places to have a cup of coffee

> until Blue Mountain opened, and then Grace and

> Favour opposite which used to include a sort of

> tea shop, if memory serves.

>

> It's always been a great place to live though,

> because of the woods and the parks nearby.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...