Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do think people need to recognise that whilst old people may be able, in theory, to 'work' IT, poor sight (cataracts anyone?) and e.g. annoying things like Parkinson's can get in the way of readily using what can appear 'fiddly' things like smart phones. I'm lucky, in my early 70s that I'm still sufficiently fit that these are not yet a hindrance, but I'm aware that they may become so, even though I'm fully able to know how tech stuff works. So 'think about the old' may well be 'think about the people not fully able' - which disproportionately do include the elderly.


Clearly the physically and technically able 'old' may feel patronised by those who plead their presumed problems - but they are not the only ones out there.


And there are technophobes - again of all ages but again disproportionately on the aging side. Who should still be able to bank with some convenience.

In answer to Sue, no stats but my and my partners parents both don't use Internet banking, they are all 80 plus and prefer going into a branch to do things


In answer to jen.., I speak for my parents generation so not using elders as a stick to bash with

In terms of paying in via the post, the issue there is that I have to request a paying in slip to be sent to me which takes about a week then whilst I could post it, with the state of deliveries recently and the additional cost of stamps it's not a great option.


Simple solution is not to close all banks in a town and work with the population rather than an accountant at head office closing it to save a few Bob

The day I was in the bank with a long queue, most people were not "old" but they still had transactions that could only be done at the counter of Barclays. You may not need to use the counter often but when you do need it, who wants to travel to one of the last remaining and therefore increasingly crowded branches just so Barclays can maintain their profits and dividends for the more wealthy in the population.

My husband helps out an elderly partial sighted friend with mobility issues with her finances. She struggles to write cheques and prefers to pay for many goods in cash. Husband, after a number of attempts, persuaded her to set up direct debits/standing orders for council tax/energy bills etc after she had received bailiffs letters for non payment. She admitted that she could not see to write cheques and her mobility problems plus the closure of Lloyd's bank (staff helped her to pay things) meant that she struggled to get to the ATM at Salisbury's and also could not see the numbers to press. She now rings my husband and he uses her card to get cash for her.


To some people, local banks are a source of assistance as mentioned above, which on line banking cannot provide.


Where my parents used to live in West Sussex, once they were not mobile, they used to ring the local Nat West Branch and the manager would drive over to them with cash and collect their cheques. I have never heard of a bank doing this- so when the local branch went to opening 2 days a week then eventually closing - the nearest bank was 8 miles away. They gave a close friend Lasting Power of Attorney and she was able to use the only ATM in the village.

In answer to Sue, no stats but my and my partners parents both don't use Internet banking, they are all 80 plus and prefer going into a branch to do things

 

 

Sorry to quibble, and sorry that your and your partner's parents will be inconvenienced, but four people you happen to know are not "most" old people!


We have to move with the times, even if change becomes mentally more difficult as we get older. Sometimes it just takes a while to get used to different ways of doing things.

My parents are both in their late 80s as are my partners and they all use internet banking and haven't stepped into a branch in years according to them.


Whether we like it or not, banks are profit making organisations and not charities. If they don't think in order to be successful they need bricks and mortar establishments then that's a pretty good indication of whether they are well used by the general population. If they were then it would not be in their interest to close.


I'm interested to understand why people actually go into banks.


I can understand you need them to pay in large volumes of coins, but you can pay in notes / cheques into ATMs (or in the rare occasion I get a cheque I send it via post to the bank). You can open new accounts on line and move money electronically.


Unfortunately, for people who don't like using the internet then banking has moved to being an on-line business now. Must be very frustrating for people who can't use a computer but I doubt that holds much sway with a big business.

You can pay cheques in using the banking app now as well. Take a photo of it within the app, it clears in a couple of days (often faster than paying it in over the counter!)


I guess the anecdotes of "old people" will be as varied as they come - there will undoubtedly be some who can't (or don't want to) use smartphones, there will be some that welcome the fact they no longer have to walk to a branch, stand in line etc for a job that can be done in minutes using a laptop or phone.


I wonder what will become of the building...? Wine bar maybe. There are only about a dozen estate agents within easy reach of it too, maybe we need another one of those... ;-)

I wonder what will become of the building...? Wine bar maybe. There are only about a dozen estate agents within easy reach of it too, maybe we need another one of those... ;-)

 

How about a posh food hall? It would be a good spot for a second branch of Gladwell's, which is in a former bank in Camberwell.

I have a severe tremor which stops me from using online, am a wheel chair user and dont drive which means that to visit HSBC I wd have to take a mini cab there and and back. Do have HSBC acount with phone voice recognition but it's service is absolutely awful.

The main reason for using that branch is that 9/10 I can use the machines inside and withdraw cash in the way I like it, the Post Office doesn't always have all the notes you wish to have them in.

 

Ditto,

I feel safe withdrawing cash in the bank.

Time will tell if I use the PO to collect cash from December or go to Rye Lane to get cash from the machines inside instead, but I think the Peckham option may be the lesser of two evils in December in the run up to Christmas.
  • 2 weeks later...

I do not understand some people's reluctance to do online banking. I use it all the time. I can see immediately what's going in and out of my account and keep tabs on my household payments for things like gas and electricity which I have a separate account for. I have not used an actual bank in years for over the counter transactions except and only when the ATM is out of service. These days you can get cashback quite easily at most big stores or supermarkets if you need to carry cash. We just have to adapt and move with the times. I'm now 80 years old and much prefer doing my banking from the comfort of my home!

 

It is possible to pay in cheques using online banking, but how do you pay in cash online?

Unfortunately it is the sign of the times, branches are closing everywhere, I bank with Santander, and I have to travel Bromley. I live in Shirley, Croydon so its not too bad.

 

Branches are closing because the end users (us) aren't raising enough objections


A branch closure normally impacts those least likely to complain.and one day soon a bank branch will be a display in a museum and like other great services (recyclable glass milk bottles, 1970s electric delivery vehicles and paper (not plastic) bags we will look back and wonder how we let them go


If you want to keep a local bank, vote with your feet and use it 😉

A long queue for the machines at Barclays at 2pm this afternoon. They had two members of staff in there helping customers one who had to be taken to the then closed counter to cash all her cheques in as she couldn't cope with the machine.


An older customer had to be helped as well as he was getting distressed when trying to use the machine, while another asked about withdrawals from the Post Office which are smaller than from a bank. He was told to go to a bank which will be harder when this branch closes in December.

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...