Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone interacted with a pedlar selling small household goods, claiming to be an ex-offender? Came to our door at around 7pm (17Aug).


I couldn’t back out of of opening the door as he was very insistant and I got a panic attack under his pressure. I ended up buying things too.


If you interacted with him too, could you verify that he was legitimately enrolled on some sort of programme? He did show me a certificate but I didn’t take a picture and did not know what to look out for. I am now scared that we might become targets for a burglary or something.


Thank you.

They have worked in the area for years, selling dusters and other cheap tat.


Yes, they are insistent and very sweary and aggressive if you don't buy.


Cannot see link with burglaries though?


Our neighbourhood Police Team gave this advice:


"regarding “the area increasingly being targeted by hawkers selling stuff from massive backpacks that they carry and them being threatening and being abusive and aggressive”.

We (SAFER NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICE TEAM) have increased our foot and mobile patrol in the area recently. We are aiming to stop them and deal with any apparent and alleged offences. I would advise you to call 999 if they become threatening and abusive and aggressive toward the residents as it clearly counts as public order offences. This would help us to stop and identify them and collect evidence while they are still in the area.


Kind Regards,


PC ADHIKARI – 2208AS"

It's not uncommon for these to be under the control of a 'gang-master' who supplies them with materials and takes (most) of the income. Ex offenders can themselves be vulnerable and the fact that they are ex-offenders (offence not disclosed, of course) supplies them with built-in intimidation. They ignore any signs which suggest that the occupier does not buy unsolicited. If we all 'don't buy' then the gang masters may see us as a poor choice of neighbourhood and go elsewhere. Normally these gangs will 'hit' an area over several days. Alerts via fora like these are useful.

Dazzi, it's definitely not an ex-offenders rehab. scheme: I contacted the Home Office a while back to ask that and got this reply:


21 Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) were established in order to deliver rehabilitation services in England and Wales to low and medium risk offenders.

The CRCs are not involved in such door-to-door selling schemes and we do not condone such activity. We firmly believe that offenders should be integrated back into the community in a more positive manner than this.

I was threatened with acid being thrown in my face, gang rape and murder by one of these delightful "ex-offenders" because I wouldn't buy anything. He also threatened to come back, smash up my car, break into the house and steal everything in it. I called the police and he was arrested, not sure what happened to him after that.... Now I never open the door to anyone I don't know, I have a videophone (not a Ring camera as I had one stolen, ironic) which also records.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...