Jump to content

Locksmith scam


emmmab

Recommended Posts

Writing this to warn people about a known locksmith scam that I had no idea about and fell victim to recently.


I called 'London Locksmith 24h'. They trade under 'Lock Services London Ltd'. This is their website: https://londonlocksmith24h.co.uk/ DO NOT use them.


I needed to regain entry to my property. When their worker arrived, he insisted that destructive entry (drilling) was necessary. He carried out the work, and when he was done he charged me £555 (!) which was never agreed upon.


I challenged this and he became aggressive, shouting at me and threatening to leave my door without a lock to it. I am female, it was night time, and I live alone. I was frightened of him, and of being left vulnerable to attack or robbery without a secure door. I was pressured into paying most of the bill and forced to pay on the spot.


Apparently it's known behaviour that reputable locksmiths are trying to warn their clients about. I went to see Callow Locksmiths after it happened and they told my that frustratingly they'd heard of lots of cases like mine. They told me that the cost (drilling, emergency call out, replacement lock) would have been around £190. They also told me that the lock never needed drilling or replacing - they would have picked it.


After the worker left, I looked the company up again and hidden under fake 5* reviews I found numerous reports describing the same experience I had, including reports of intimidating single women, as well as extorting people for unnecessary work in an emergency situation, forcing them to pay on the spot and becoming aggressive if they refused.


Key thing to note - a good locksmith will ALWAYS try to enter non-destructively (i.e. picking the lock). If a locksmith arrives and tries to drill straight away, ask them to leave. The master locksmith association has this advice https://www.locksmiths.co.uk/faq/how-to-spot-rogue-locksmith/



The whole thing has been really disturbing. Hoping that writing this will stop at least one person around here from falling victim to it!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/316396-locksmith-scam/
Share on other sites

I have had three episodes where I needed an emergency locksmith out of normal working hours and each time I called the usual local locksmiths' emergency call out and each time have never managed to get those local locksmiths to come out. They were "busy on other jobs" and had a several hour wait although one said he had to take his son to a football match!! Honest at least.


I resorted to an online "emergency locksmith" and paid over the odds but they got me into my house at night and that was appreciated.


If you can wait until normal working hours by staying with a friend or relative overnight or whatever then you're more likely to get one of the local locksmiths at a reasonable price.


If you can't wait then ring around and always get a price before the emergency ones attend including for drilling and replacing the lock if necessary.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...