Jump to content

Recommended Posts

? Travis? or is it Siv Art.

Uses Americanisms but also uses old English measurements ? FEET? .

So must be of the pre decimal era.

Does indicate that he is heading back to Heber Road School?

Further education Evening Classes?


? They were still arguing a mile down the road, where they reached the turnoff that went north to Heber? .

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31643-bad-writing/#findComment-639351
Share on other sites

This thread prompted me to look on the web for bad writing awards and I found a perfect website: http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/2012win.html How's this for dreadful (the winning phrase):


Winner 2012


As he told her that he loved her she gazed into his eyes, wondering, as she noted the infestation of eyelash mites, the tiny deodicids burrowing into his follicles to eat the greasy sebum therein, each female laying up to 25 eggs in a single follicle, causing inflammation, whether the eyes are truly the windows of the soul; and, if so, his soul needed regrouting. ? Cathy Bryant, Manchester, England

The winner of the 2012 Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest is Cathy Bryant of Manchester, England.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31643-bad-writing/#findComment-639359
Share on other sites

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> isn't he a scientologist? says it all really.


xxxxxxx


In case anybody thinks that has anything to do with how I came to be looking at the website, heaven forbid, it was because I came across this quote:


?All I ask is for an objective consideration of all the evidence. Anyone who won't do that isn?t really entitled to an opinion.? ? Travis Walton


I thought it was an excellent quote, and I'd never heard of Travis Walton, so I googled him. Now I sort of wish I hadn't :))


And the writing is so extraordinarily bad that I can't even read enough of it to find out what his supposed evidence is :))

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31643-bad-writing/#findComment-639362
Share on other sites

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Impaled by the sight, we were held transfixed

> ..." - someone needs to get laid.


xxxxxx


:)) :)) :))


ETA: Voyageur, I haven't looked at the website you mentioned yet but surely, surely, surely that winning entry was deliberately written to be bad?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31643-bad-writing/#findComment-639363
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...