Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We've just received a letter home from school about the student support centre. If you get one too then I suggest you read this article


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/9018047/The-2700-tuition-hard-sell.html


It's not exactly a scam but very sharp practice at least, signing people up to a credit agreement which they can't get out of if they decide the programmes don't suit their child. Several thousand pounds for something you don't want would be a big issue for most.


The schools receive a fee for the number of forms they send back.

newtoedf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LA school - an awful lot of schools are caught out

> by this firm.

>

> It might be worth sending a copy of the article to

> your school and warning them in advance. Hindsight

> is a wonderful thing...


Surely the school, especially the headteacher, would be aware that they are sending out advertising material in their name? I would have thought that the school would have had to say 'yes' to the firm providing the materials.


Except perhaps the firm is going straight to LAs for approval and LAs are saying 'yes' on behalf of the school and are allowing this (does the ?150 go to the school or the LA?). Wouldn't surprise me, profiteering at any cost is rampant these days.

The standard practice is for the school to send out a letter on their letterhead and enclose the leaflet from the student support centre. The school are very clear that they are circulating this but not (I hope!)about the sales practices of the firm involved. That's why it is probably a good idea to alert them in advance.


I dropped a letter of complaint in this morning to the head and one to the chair of governors and explained the situation to the office staff - we'll see what this afternoon's book bags hold...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...