Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting to see the proposals bring unveiled today by Labour.


They include a reform of the house of Lords and more devolved powers. Proposals also include more revenue raising powers for local government and 50,000 civil service jobs being moved out of London.


A few things strike me

One. 50,000 staff members will be expensive to relocate, if indeed they want to move and if they don't that's a lot of knowledge and skill lost. With the current working practices, more people are working remotely so again they may not want to do a long commute on their days in the office.


Two. Devolving power, whilst allowing local decisions to be made, adds layers of bureaucracy which in turn adds costs which means services cost more.


Three. The concept of more revenue raising smacks of local taxes which means the government can say they haven't raised taxes but we all end up paying more.


The plans to reform the House of Lords sounds like it will echo the American system, and if so can we expect to see one house blocking the other if opposing parties have their political members in power ?


Will these ideas being presented work or will they add to the problems?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/318865-labours-proposals/
Share on other sites

Good to see something more definite rather than just sitting back and waiting for Tories to fail.


They've been moving civil servants out of the SE for getting on for 50 years - in particular processing applications, benefit etc. Just feels a bit of a popularist announcement.


More of a struggle for those closer to ministers - previous governments of both colours have promised to do this, some failed dramatically, a good review up to the last Labour government https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN02588/SN02588.pdf


Ultimately I expect decisions will be pragmatic - who has to be close to Westminister/Whitehall, (some staff have been moved out to Croydon which didn't count as London in earlier programmes) and particularly with the shrinking of the central London estate, which was happening before Covid, how much function can be done away from SW1.

Two. Devolving power, whilst allowing local decisions to be made, adds layers of bureaucracy which in turn adds costs which means services cost more.

I'm not convinced by your cost assertions tbh but I'm surprised that Labour is proposing more devolution - as it's never been particularly popular with English voters...

House of Lords. I have mixed feelings. Current structure has crossbenchers (ex civil servants, academics...) who give a broader critique of legislation.


Devolution risk of more postcode lotteries like we see in NHS. Policy different in Lambeth and Southwark despite now being same ICS (was CCG).

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think you can write to your local council to get the street cleaned more regularly. Also the may put more posters up to remind ppl to do clean up 
    • Absolutely right.  The other issue is that rescue centres like Celia Hammond make it nearly impossible to adopt a kitten or cat that desperately needs a home. I know many many people who have tried to adopt and have been refused, and only one couple who have been deemed to have a good enough home. The reasons people have been refused have been that they aren't in a position to take two kittens - unless it's changed recently you weren't considered unless you took 2 as cats  wouldn't be homed without a companion. But lots of people can't afford to feed and insure 2 pets. Another reason I've heard several times is that the potential adoptee lives on a road, not an A road or the south circular but just a road. But what is the other option they're looking for? A country estate? Another reason a couple of friends have been refused is that they have jobs and Celia Hammond said that they were looking for people who were at home all day . So again, what are they looking for? People who can afford not to work?  We are told 'adopt don't shop' but out of the many many families or individuals I know who have tried to give a loving home to a kitten / cat literally only a couple have been accepted, so have ended up buying a kitten. People who have had cats all their lives and adore cats. Of course it's important that adoptees are vetted but it's problematic that cat charities are deciding that a cat / kitten without a home would rather live in a cage at a rescue centre than with a loving person who has a job or lives on a road or cannot afford to pay for the upkeep of more than one pet. My friend has recently tried for months to adopt kittens or cats through various centres and although she was prepared to take two, was rejected by all rescue centres  as she lives on a (quiet) residential road in ED and doesn't work from home every day. She works from home 3 days a week. It's insane.   
    • Most owners do.  Beyond getting it off you chest, or shoe, you won't change a thing by posting here 
    • Kartuli is my favourite window - looking so beautiful! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...