Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Crass ??


Bob Crass ..?


I'll try and work out why.. ?


Edit to include:-

Around the year 1905, in a seaside town on the south coast of England, a group of painters and decorators are about to have dinner ? what we Guardian readers call lunch. The men are renovating a big, ramshackle Victorian house called The Cave.



Foxy.

Well that was very cryptic..


Still have not worked out the Gardening bit...


Will need to make this harder than my first attempt solved in about 5 minutes...


Right.. here we go...


First Clue..


'Fictional character that does not appear in the story line.'


I'm off out for some fodder. Check out all your answers soon.

Have fun.


Foxy.

The fictional character of this piece of literature is referenced throughout.


The title of the piece is not the main character, may well qualify for a Bronze medal in his field of work.


and the main character's name is irrelevent if not unknown.


Too much given away here I think.


Foxy

Not The right awnswer aquarius moon


But .. you really did get the clue spot on..


In a way.. you were very close to solving the first part of this 'Conundrum' [clue]?


The Book was first rejected by the publishers remained unpublished until the authors death in 1966.


First identify the Book....


The character is not in the story line of the book, but there are countless references to this ficticious

inventor and scientist. [big Clue]


Foxy

The Character I am looking for is mentioned by the author throughout the book.


Written in the First Person the name of the main characters is never revealed.


Big Clue to identifiy the Book.


?Who is Fox?", I asked.

"Policeman Fox is the third of us," said the Sergeant, "but we never see him or hear tell of him at because he is always on his beat and never off it and he signs the book in the middle of the night when even a badger is asleep. He is as mad as a hare, he never interrogates the public and he is always taking notes.?


Now find the fictitious inventor..


Foxy

stacey-lyn Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds very Kafkaesque, Foxy. Rather Kafka meets

> The Prisoner.

> But I'm obviously not that well read. So I'm out.



Blimey... stacey-lyn. had to look up 'Kafkaesque'


Marked by surreal distortion and often a sense of impending danger


That is exactly what the book is.


Written in 1940 / rejected by the publishers / finally published in 1966 after the death of the Author.

The work of an Irish literary genius..


Has become a fine example of Cult Literature..


Re-published frequently with new cover designs


Foxy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...