Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, march46 said:

There are literally shovels in the ground, pedestrianising it yet some on here are calling for a referendum on whether it should exist. Time to admit defeat and move on?

This is now the fourth time there have been shovels in the ground...how much more money can the council waste on this folly? 

I can't wait for the grand opening...I am sure the councillors will be grandstanding their handiwork and avoiding questions about why so much has been spent on one junction.

No we need to get cars back through that junction. Even with the queues of cars it was better than the mess we have now.

 

Frankly I think they should remove the barrier on Gilkes too while they are at it. They could make a high capacity gyratory down Gilkes, the Calton junction, Dulwich village and East Dulwich Grove.

2 hours ago, Rockets said:

…you should probably be questioning… why people are still challenging the council over their wastage of millions of pounds of tax-payers money.

 

Some of us are clearly not happy to turn a blind eye to such wastage.

…But would waste more on reversing it 🤔 

Edited by Earl Aelfheah

You sound like a councillor trying to justify why they refused to make the changes when the emergency services said that the closures needed to be reopened as they were putting lives at risk. Why is it you all happily turned a blind eye to that? Do you think the emergency services were lying? Do you and the council have some ideological opposition to the emergency services or were they (and the people who needed them) just collateral damage?

At least you are acknowledging that they have wasted tax-payers money on it - one step at a time and all that!

19 hours ago, raptortruckman69 said:

They could make a high capacity gyratory down Gilkes, the Calton junction, Dulwich village and East Dulwich Grove.

Bit unambitious there, bud. If you look at a satellite map, if you demolished just one of the houses directly to the south of Gail's on Dulwich Village, you could get an access road into Dulwich Park. Then you'd just need to upgrade the surfacing to get a direct link to the Queen Margaret Gate and the South Circular. 👍👍👍

On 19/09/2024 at 07:04, Rockets said:

You sound like a councillor trying to justify why they refused to make the changes when the emergency services said that the closures needed to be reopened as they were putting lives at risk. Why is it you all happily turned a blind eye to that? Do you think the emergency services were lying? Do you and the council have some ideological opposition to the emergency services or were they (and the people who needed them) just collateral damage?

At least you are acknowledging that they have wasted tax-payers money on it - one step at a time and all that!

Spot on. 

16 minutes ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

I'm still furious that they stopped cars driving through Dulwich Park in the 60s. 

Why because did that displace traffic onto other routes causing more congestion and pollution as part of efforts to create less congestion and pollution?

  • Like 1

Of course. And there was no consultation. I blame the LCC. They hadn't broken cover / didn't officially exist then, but we know that they were still pulling the strings behind the scenes. Don't think we're moving on after only 60 years 

Edited by Earl Aelfheah
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
20 minutes ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

…you might be right about this, I wasn’t actually sure when they closed it to through traffic. Still furious though 😡 

Ahhh the good old days 

It was akin to driving through Richmond park, only not so grand.

Still it's a good thing it's just a park now where people can gather, sit, relax and enjoy coffee.  Much nicer than being next to a smelly road or converted junction in my opinion. 

  • Confused 1

I'm not sure you could normally exit out onto the South Circular, even then (it would have been a bad idea if you could) - I think you could drive between The Court Lane and Old College Gate entrances. Which was convenient but never an obvious cut-through for traffic, just useful for locals

Never a through route that I remember. People would park and visit, so really no different to now other than people pay to park. But it wasn't as though you ever had lots of people driving round the park or using it to get from A-Z. What has massively increased is cyclists using local parks as through routes and not all observe sensible speed limits. I have no issue with cyclists in the park other than when they use it as a velodrome.

To get this back on thread; do we know if cyclists will have to dismount and wheel through the pedestrianised Dulwich junction?

Edited by first mate

No Dulwich square will keep the cycle router so cyclists won't be legally obliged (just morally) to dismount. This adds insult to injury as far as I'm concerned.

 

On the plus side, the very expensive benches that the civil was going to discard Jane been reinstated. They are clearly still keeping an eye on places like this so we should keep making a fuss. It's a small sop, but better than nothing.

5 hours ago, first mate said:

To get this back on thread; do we know if cyclists will have to dismount and wheel through the pedestrianised Dulwich junction?

I doubt it but looking at how narrow the cycle track currently is they might have to as that chicane will become problematic with the speed some cyclists hurtle down Calton.

You used to be able to drive through the park. It was actually one of the reasons the Dulwich Society was first formed (to campaign for it to stop). People could drive through from Dulwich Common to the Village entrance as well (not just court Lane).

[edited to add] according to Wikipedia cars have not been able to drive in the park since 2003 (?!). That seems very late and I’m sure you couldn’t cut through / use the gates then.

My dad certainly remembers driving through from the south circular, but can’t give you a timeline on that. Would be interested if anyone does know when it stopped. Like I said above I thought it was the 60’s or 70’s but could have been later.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah
6 hours ago, Rockets said:

I doubt it but looking at how narrow the cycle track currently is they might have to as that chicane will become problematic with the speed some cyclists hurtle down Calton.

I think you are right, since this is an important through route it could get very busy. Will this area have lots of storage for e-bikes, I wonder?

Earl is now taking us off thread so suggest they do a new thread on the history of car access in Dulwich Park...this one is about LTNs. More pertinent is that DP is used as a through route for cycling commuters, including e-bikes.

13 hours ago, raptortruckman69 said:

the very expensive benches that the civil was going to discard Jane been reinstated. They are clearly still keeping an eye on places like this so we should keep making a fuss. 

Or, you know, the original hysterical assumption that the workers are wasteful idiots who know nothing about their job was wrong.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, my daughter has a basic electric keyboard she really should clear out of her old room. It's a classic beginners one. Are you interested?  If so, I'll photograph it and find the name.    Lottie 
    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years       Looks like Lucy Connolly will me one of those Reform candidates at next election tells you everything you need to know about that party and where the country would be headed 
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...