Visit out new Tradespeople Directory! ×

Builder

By Brooks
May 31, 2013 in Request a Tradesperson

Recommended Posts

Brooks

Posted May 31, 2013

- Share

Posted May 31, 2013

I thought I'd put a recomendation up for our builder who came recomended through a friend of mine. The work his team of guys did is fantastic and reasonable. They replastered all of our walls and ceilings, fixed plumbing issues, laid wooden floor down, fixed and tidied up our sash windows and other smaller jobs. All were done well and quickly.

Krystian's company is called SK Services and his number is: 07832 234123

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32809-builder/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Poundland East Dulwich soon to be replaced by Tesco Express
  
  By mitchiner · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By HeadNun · Posted 3 hours ago
  
  Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it. Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story. But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases.
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By Sephiroth · Posted 3 hours ago
  
  judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By HeadNun · Posted 3 hours ago
  
  Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same?

Sign In