Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mal you started a thread on the subject of licensing, can you continue your discussion on there?

I erroneously posted this on the wrong thread:

The thing is, it is already the case that cyclists can be fined for cycling on paths that are not shared, so why not add this to the work of community wardens as they do their CPZ rounds?

On 24/11/2024 at 17:24, Rockets said:

Here's what happens when you mix cyclists and pedestrians....happening all over London because our active travel leaders care only for cycling. 

https://x.com/NFBUK/status/1860646947574468737?s=19

No idea who 'our active travel leaders' are. But yes, that's a terrible design. I suspect you'll find most people travelling by bike are not particularly keen on that layout either, but of course, you have to to make it 'us versus them'.... on that, do you have to keep reposting divisive anti 'cyclist' stuff from Twitter on here? If people want to follow you down a Twitter rabbit hole, they can do it on.. err, Twitter?  That platform is toxic and you're going a long way to making this section of the forum just as bad.

  • Agree 2
On 29/11/2024 at 14:54, Earl Aelfheah said:

No idea who 'our active travel leaders' are. But yes, that's a terrible design. I suspect you'll find most people travelling by bike are not particularly keen on that layout either, but of course, you have to to make it 'us versus them'.... on that, do you have to keep reposting divisive anti 'cyclist' stuff from Twitter on here? If people want to follow you down a Twitter rabbit hole, they can do it on.. err, Twitter?  That platform is toxic and you're going a long way to making this section of the forum just as bad.

Couldn't agree more. This local forum feels like it is being subverted by culture war nonsense of dubious political origin. Smart move by admin to split off the roads and transport stuff, it feels like less and less people can be bothered to engage with it

  • Agree 4

But here you are; you are engaging with it.

It is amusing that you, along with various other anti car/pro LTN posters on here, keep trying to shut this stuff down. Why? Why the need to even try? 
 
As I have said before, I am reasonably sure that most of the posters that disagree with your stance are annoyed local residents who dislike the way the council have handled their strategy on road closures, sometimes using less than transparent methods, spending millions on projects like Dulwich Junction in the process.

Why don't you become one of those people you say cannot be bothered to engage with 'it' and stop airing your frankly outlandish conspiracy theories on here?

  • Confused 1

I do not drive, I do not have a car, never have owned one. I cycle but not in London. I walk a lot.

I am sick and tired of the cycle lobby bullying everyone into their own tiny tiny world.

@DulvilleRes "This local forum feels like it is being subverted by culture war nonsense of dubious political origin.' - what does this mean?

 

Malumbu, absolutely nonsense. You can support active travel measures but oppose a specific implementation of an active travel measure. Stop viewing the world as a binary one - a lot on the pro-lobby really struggle to see that there can be a middle ground and this is why so many think their behaviour can be a cultish - it's their way or nothing else. 

Lockdown was an active travel measure, you were allowed to walk a bit but otherwise had to stay in your house. Pollution caused by traffic reduced etc etc. What's not to like? So let's have permanent lockdown as an active travel measure and anyone who disagrees with a permanent state of lockdown is a fascist secret Tory who must be despised for their views. 

8 hours ago, Penguin68 said:

Lockdown was an active travel measure, you were allowed to walk a bit but otherwise had to stay in your house. Pollution caused by traffic reduced etc etc. What's not to like? So let's have permanent lockdown as an active travel measure and anyone who disagrees with a permanent state of lockdown is a fascist secret Tory who must be despised for their views. 

Pretty much

On 05/07/2023 at 16:23, Pugwash said:

Nearly mowed down by female cyclist whilst crossing on Green man to Dulwich Library. Yelled at her (woman in 20/30s) but was ignored and no apologies given.

She probably had earphones in. Nobody cares about others any more that's the root issue. How do you get people to have more empathy and consideration?

More of a major issue is cyclists consistently cycling fast through red lights at traffic lights. Usually lime bike cyclists. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hen123, you've presumably watched it.  Does it deal at all with the question of the anticipated per capita future costs of necessary repairs to or upgrading of the ?still largely old underground piping across their area, and how that compares with future risks existing in other areas?  I wonder too whether the latest apparent concentrated spate of leaks is attributable at all to the heat. TW say that they have not made any dividend payments to external shareholders (among them a Candian teachers pension fund) since 2017.    There have been like payments, though, to their holding companies (?Kemble, and Thames ?something), reportedly I think to service debts to them. Thames Water annual company reports are available online.
    • I was talking to my brother in the law last weekend who works for a different water company. He said he and his colleagues watch TW’s woes with a mixed of horror, disbelief and then relief that they work for a different water company. Worth a watch. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00284vt
    • But Thatcher is dead. Nobody since has brought the utilities back under public ownership (if that's the right term). So there are many people who could be blamed. Meanwhile the shareholders get richer and everyone else gets increasing bills and a poorer service. Plus as said above, a massive waste of a limited resource like water. Not to mention the polluted rivers and seas. At least the privatisation of the railways is being reversed. Hopefully water may be on the list somewhere.
    • That's really helpful. Do the Community Councils still exist? It sounds to me that whoever the contact is on the council who has sorted out the North Cross Road notice board and put the new list of councillors in it must at least have access to the key for that one? Unless it was one of the unlocked ones. And of course if somebody knows where the keys are, they may have no idea that people are looking for them or that this forum thread exists. Which are the notice boards which are not locked?  The very helpful locksmith near the station (?Callows?)  might be able to provide keys for them, or if not, new locks, in return for some local publicity? In fact, they may be able to advise in general, rather than keep trying unresponsive people at the council. But then of course there is still the question of who is going to take responsibility for putting appropriate East Dulwich community information into them and updating it as necessary.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...