Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's a bit of a myth that ponds need to be deep unless you want to keep fish. The best organisation for giving advice on ponds is Pond Conservation. They recommend that a pond needs to be no deeper than 30cm. Shallow areas are good for wildlife and this depth shouldn't cause problems with oxygen levels or the whole pond freezing. It should also be filled with rain water and washed gravel or play sand can be used to cover the liner. My own pond is this depth and even though it is only in its second year has been really successful and looks very natural. The highlight so far has been 2 pairs of Large Red Damselfly mating and egg laying in it.

http://www.pondconservation.org.uk/advice/makingpondsforwildlife

http://www.animalphotos.me/moth/moth-jer.htm


A Jersey Tiger (identification, thanks to the above site) in the hollow of a foxglove leaf this morning, a jewel against the green. The site remarks on "a small population in Southeast London" -- otherwise, the Channel Islands, as the name suggests. At least in 2013, the small population persists.

Alex, I saw one very briefly a week or two ago - in the heatwave, at the top of Underhill Rd. It sought shelter in the Old Cemetery trees.

For anyone interested, this species has an orange underwing. http://www.uksafari.com/jerseytigers.htm


please send sightings in to the Butterfly Count project, here http://www.bigbutterflycount.org/

There seems to be an epidemic of these this year. I usually see maybe two or three a year. Putting a black light UV tube out in the garden the other night, there was at one time no fewer than eight of these beauts at one time landed on the white reflector.

We will be hosting another Moth night in early September for anyone interested. Details to be posted here.

We're seeing more of them because of the weather & wherever JT caterpillars food plants are allowed to flourish.


Insects in cities are currently doing better than in the countryside, as townspeople aren't spraying pesticides as much as farmers do.

Wildlife areas reward us, although at first glance big clumps of nettles or dandelions mightn't seem like beauties.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...