Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As the title says, we are looking for recommendations for British holiday destinations in July that a 2.5y old will enjoy and easy with a baby. Given the non-existent summer, it would be great if there were a reasonable selection (3?) of indoor activities available. We are planning to go for a week. Happy to drive for a few hours if needed.


Thanks!

Cornwall is v well suited to families & cater v well to the uk climate (is by no means a beach & nothing else place). Think if I recommend where we stay again it will start to look like I've got shares, but needless to say, there's lots of fab family friendly accommodation down there - pm if you'd like more info (or search me + Cornwall on here!)
The new forest is lovely, holborne naish or bashley have really friendly sites where you can hire a caravan or if you prefer something nicer we have hired a lodge. The kids entertainment is good and lots going on with swimming etc. The new forest is so pretty with the wild ponies and lots of forest walks etc.
  • 1 month later...
Taking your kids for a holiday at South West England would be great. You can tour around the places such as Cornwal, St Ives, Padstow, and more. It's the home for family frienly holidays. Your children will enjoy the beach, parks and museums. Here are more places to explore in Britain: http://www.myguidebritain.com/south-west-england. If you decided on having a south west trip, Cornwall would be the best place to stay. There are self catering holidays there such as http://www.bluechipholidays.co.uk/cornwall-holiday-cottages that offers great discounts for July.

Thanks, oaurvey, going to book mark this page for our next staycation, as it looks ideal.


We ended up going to the Cotswolds - we hired a 5 bed house, took my parents, MIL, SIL and her 3y old daughter. It was great (suprisingly), as there were 3 grandparents on hand to entertain, prep meals and babysit one, both or all kids (which they loved); the toddlers entertained each other and we were able to nap! There was an onsite pool, farms nearby and Cirencester is very close. All within a 2.5h drive from home, bonus :)

I know this recommendation is too late but in case youvate looking for somewehere new for next year! My

friend has just renovated a house in Southwold into two beautiful holiday lets. She has two young children so the focus is very much family friendly. The decor is beautiful and the location is fabulous - about 2mins from the beach! I particularly love that area of Suffolk. Beautiful countryside, coastline and lots of great restaurants, pubs and shopping.


Sleeps 4:


http://www.bestofsuffolk.co.uk/suffolk-cottages/3chesteroad-southwold.asp


and the larger flat that sleeps 6 + 2 (the 2 being a bunk room)


http://www.bestofsuffolk.co.uk/suffolk-cottages/3achesteroad-southwold.asp

simonethebeaver Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought a staycation was when you stayed at home

> but took time off normal life and did touristy

> things. Aren't you just talking about a holiday?



http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/staycation

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...