Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just thought people might want to know.

My other half got of the bus at the Townley Road stop on East Dulwich Grove coming from Herne Hill.

When he got off the bus he was followed by five guys. It was by pure luck he managed to dodge one of them as they attempted to punch him to the ground, he then ran into the pizza place and called the police.

It happened just after midnight last night along that stretch of road opposite Dulwich Hospital at a point when there was no traffic.

Please keep aware and keep safe

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/33677-attempted-mugging/
Share on other sites

Hi


Yes the police were called. They could not find the guys once they arrived. Although they were quick to respond they had long run off. They gave him a lift home and took a statement and as much of a description as could be given. As he had managed to avoid injury and the mugging no crime had actually been committed so nothing official gets reported.


No they hadn't been on the bus they came out of Green Dale


He was wearing head phones but nothing else visible just carrying his over shoulder nondescript bag


He was very lucky

I'm glad he was ok & thanks for posting as a warning.


Typical of the police to say there was no crime, so they don't have to record it as unresolved. But if the guys attempted to punch him resulting in him running away/avoiding the punch, that is technically an assault. They only have to take an action which causes fear of violence. The police should record it as a crime.

if you were intimidated at school you wouldn't accept it


why should you in life.



ElmGrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> skipper Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'd aadvise not wearing headphones when walking

> > home late at night also.

>

> Agree, even wearing them while walking about in

> the daytime can be dangerous.

Good reasons :)


But muting my phone and hiding it when it rings in case

some greedy thief sees it is not me.


I'm on an on call system too :)


ElmGrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nicholas Spears Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Because you don't want to be run over by a car

> you

> > couldn't hear?

>

>

> Yes, and because someone could be shouting a

> warning to you about something which you also

> wouldn't hear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...