Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all!

I'm new to the forum and am really interested in buying a flat in Petworth house within the dog kennel hill estate. The flat would be ex local authority. The building looks fantastic and you get a lot of space within the flats. Since I'd be a first time buyer I was hoping to get some advice / thoughts from people on here.

I would be a leaseholder and a large concern of mine would be for any major works planned, as I've heard the bills can be huge. Does anyone who owns a flat within the dog kennel hill estate have information on how much they roughly pay for major works on average each year? And also if anyone is aware of any planned for the upcoming months/years? I hear there are surveys for the building safety act coming up?

I also had a question about renovations. I've heard that changes to the property have to be put forward to the council before doing them. Does this also concern cosmetic things? I.e. putting up shelves, changing carpets etc? It seems a bit crazy asking for permission for these things after paying for a property.

Thanks in advance for the help! I really appreciate it. All going well, hopefully see you soon!

Cheers! 

From what I have heard from other leaseholders in Southwark  bills  from £5000  to £30.000  depending on type of work. My old neighbour was in a conversion flat and paid £5000 for exterior painting including scaffolding costs and within 3 months most of the paint has worn off.

The bills are indeed often horrific. Can't help feeling that the books are highly cooked against the leaseholders' favour, meaning bills of 10,000s that the leaseholders have to pay. You'd be paying way above what's normal market value for the works whether they be new windows, utilities, upkeep of  communal areas, roofs and guttering, green space, carparks etc. The problem is you can't just pay for your eg. own new windows (which is typical for most leaseholders in purpose built developments) but do have to pay up for the figure on which Southwark agree with a contractor. (IMO tendering will likely involve bidding contractors each quoting very high sums, so difficult for you to argue against it.) On the plus side you're likely to be able to pay for works in instalments and pass on such dues to the next owner when you sell if you've not finished paying.

If you love the flat then get on and buy it, but take detailed written and verbal advice from your solicitor during the transaction. It's a good place to live, so good luck! 👍🏻 

Please do your research about leaseholder restrictions and responsibilities. I would not recommend any purchase of flat in a LA owned building. It’s cheaper than in any equivalent privately owned block for a very, very good reason.

Walk away - please find somewhere else.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...