Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Unless you have been told not to, I would suggest sex and ethnicity may also be worth collecting for this survey for analysis - health and deprivation issues may be linked to these variables, and at least collecting them will allow you to analyse this. As might household income (in bands). Age and housing, which you have chosen,  are both good variables however. 

Unless you are using other data collection methods you should note that this is a self selecting (not random) sample, and that it will be skewed potentially as it is drawn from what may be a self-limiting population (those registered on this board). Which will include those not living locally in SE London. 

Properly speaking, in order to have any significance, you will probably need populations of 100+ in each analysis 'box'. So, if breaking down by sex, a sample of 200 (100 men and 100 women) - but if breaking down by your 5 age groups a sample of 500. However, even if you don't achieve that, your research design is important and acknowledging that particular sets of analysis may have too small a sample size to be significant shows that you understand the limitations of what you are doing.

I wish you luck

I just started doing the questionnaire, but I can't work out how to select my ethnicity.

I'm White.

Are you assuming that English, Scottish etc  people  are White?

Because unless I've missed it, there is no category for or mention of White except "any other White background".

But somebody born in England etc could be of Indian origin, for example, but still be English or Scottish,  so what would they put? Can you select more than one category?

It doesn't feel right to me, sorry. Where did you get the categories from? Had you considered using the ones used in the census, for example?

I didn't feel I could continue with it 😥

Edited by Sue

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We went in for a quote for our tiny bathroom and they said it would cost £8-10k for off the shelf items and installation.   We looked around and found https://thehousemartin.co/about He did the work for less than 5k, including plastering, carpentry of a custom cabinet, plumbing, painting and tiling. The quality of finished work was very high so we can't recommend him highly enough, the only additional cost to us was purchasing the fixtures.
    • I thought it was lovely, thank you for sharing 😊
    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...