Jump to content

Tommee Tippee Advanced Steam Electric Steriliser for Baby Bottles - Like New - £25


Recommended Posts

Like New, Fully Cleaned. Bought for £50

Collection SE27

 

Manufacturers info:

Product details

Having clean, sterilised bottles ready for every feed is an essential part of caring for your baby. The Advanced Steam Electric Steriliser gives you a quick and easy way to protect your baby’s tummy from harmful bacteria and viruses*. *Tested against Influenza H1N1 (tested to EN 16777). The less time you spend cleaning and preparing your bottles, the better. With this electric steriliser you can sterilise up to 6 baby bottles in just 5 minutes* ensuring you have feed-ready bottles on hand for your baby, any time.

Features

  • Kills viruses* and 99.9% of bacteria: Viruses & bacteria don't stand a chance against our Steam Steriliser. This steriliser uses steam to kill 99.9% of harmful bacteria & viruses without chemicals
  • Quick sterilisation cycle: The Tommee Tippee Electric Steam Steriliser delivers 6 sterile baby bottles in just 5 minutes
  • Time-saving: Use this baby bottle steriliser to sterilise your bottles and other feeding accessories in advance as contents are kept sterile for up to 24 hours with the lid closed**
  • Easy to use: One-button-start and auto shut-off for safety. The easy-lift handles keep hands away from steam and 2-tier stackable tray can also be used as drying rack
  • Compatibility: Use this microwave steriliser with baby bottles from other brands as well as soothers, breast pumps and other feeding accessories

20240430_081108.jpg

20240430_081121.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...