Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Incredibly long story short - we had had issues with our neighbour who lives in a Southwark council property for over five years now. I won't go into the details but he shouts and swears abuse and racist profanities at us. We have engaged with his Housing Officer & with the police on more occasions than I'd care to mention, but have made zero to little progress. It is seriously impacting the mental health of all of my family, as well as our capacity to work from home. Does anyone have any experience of suing (or threatening to sue) Southwark Council because their tenants are in breach of their contract by behaving in this anti-social manner? If anyone has any guidance of who we might be able to speak to, I'd be incredibly grateful, as we have almost reached breaking point 😞

  • Sad 1

Sorry to hear about this.  Do you have legal expenses cover in your home insurance that would allow you to consult a solicitor?   What did the housing officer say/do?  Did you go through the formal complaints procedure that all councils seem to require?   I think that you can then go to the Local Government Ombudsman after this procedure has been gone through.   But do call the LGO first.

 


 

 

 

 

Edited by Froglander
Addition

I'm not sure what it would gain. The court ordering Southwark to issue an ASBO possibly. 

Have you tried contacting your local counsellor and seeing if they can help?

Have the police followed up with the person? They ought to have done. 

 

You really need to speak to a lawyer/CAB for advice on 1) who is the most appropriate to sue, Southwark or the tenant and 2) whether there are other options.

Complex area to get quick resolution as, based on his behaviour, it sounds as if your neighbour might have mental health issues. Is the local Community Mental Health Team involved?

Also regarding police, are you solely reporting to the Met or have you also approached your local Safer Neighbourhood Team? They can be very good on asb and neighbour disputes. That said, if you and your family are in immediate danger call 999.

Keep on at Housing Officer/RSO and also try to get Southwark's ASBU engaged.

Good to get councillor and/or MP support and advice.

Is Southwark also your freeholder?

See brief summary re landlord's potential responsibility for tenant's asb: https://www.insight-law.co.uk/blog/are-landlords-responsible-for-tenant-behaviour/ - on a landlord & tenant law firm's website. Good indication of what questions to ask etc..

Also Shelter England: https://england.shelter.org.uk/professional_resources/legal/housing_conditions/nuisance_and_asb/complaints_to_social_landlords_about_antisocial_behaviour

Edited by IlonaM
Addition of Shelter England details
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

I have just realised that I never responded to this thread, but wanted to thank you all for your words of advice. We have engaged over a period of many years with both the council and the police, but neither of them are taking responsibility for this issue, hence why we are wanting to escalate. Anyways, there's a few additional pieces of info above that we hadn't considered, so thank you!

1 hour ago, pilsbury said:

I have just realised that I never responded to this thread, but wanted to thank you all for your words of advice. We have engaged over a period of many years with both the council and the police, but neither of them are taking responsibility for this issue, hence why we are wanting to escalate. Anyways, there's a few additional pieces of info above that we hadn't considered, so thank you!

Good luck.

Did you go to the top at the council? Because often that will bring results that dealing with people lower down the chain doesn't.

If the harassment and abuse is persistent it might also be worth considering whether you can get a restraining order as a pre-cursor to having the neighbour arrested and imprisoned for continually breaching it?

The tenancy agreement stipulates that eviction proceedings can be instigated against any tenant or a member of the household for breach of tenancy.One of the breaches is antisocial behaviour, so the Housing Officer has a duty to investigate, collect evidence and initiate possession proceedings against the tenant. When they receive a complaint, they should first call the tenant for an interview and put the complaints to them. The HO reminds them that anti social behaviour is a breach of tenancy. They inform the tenant that they will be closely monitored and that their tenancy is at risk of they continue. I know this because I was a HO and this was my job. You should go back to the HO and ask if they have done this. If they have dragged their heels on this, proceed to the Council's formal complaints procedure. Not sure of the timeline off head but if no joy after this and you are not satisfied with their response, make a complaint to the ombudsman who has a duty to investigate.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...