Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was interested (Otta) in the Suarez insight into how a manager manages and improves players.

I was interested in how this sits with those who have given so much credit for Liverpool's near miss to Suarez, whilst Suarez now gives much of the credit for his development to Rodgers.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Otta Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Yep, bit of a cock, but he can definitely

> > play.

> > >

> > >

> > > A bit????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> >

> >

> > Haha, okay a complete cock.

>

> And he is our complete cock now. Keeps the head

> screwed like the last season and he will run amok.



Alternatively a cynic might argue that he didn't think he could cut in the premier league, and jumped ship as soon as he could. The Premier league will be all the poorer for the lack of his wonderful philosophical musings.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wasn't there a 'transfer committee'?...

>

>

> Of which he was a part of, no?


Yes, if there was this 'transfer committee' he would've been part of it, but your initial post implied they were his signings alone,whereas the reality may be that he didn't want certain players but had to bow down to the majority decision...

Agreed RD - Ronny Deila at Celtic, was quoted as saying "I said yes to every signing" - that's a far cry from being in any way in control of signings.


Rodgers has already said Lawell and Desmond have supported him on transfer policy - I'm guessing he feels slightly stung by the Liverpool experience and it was an important part of the Celtic discussions that he will have some autonomy. I hope so anyway - there wont be a lot of money, so he needs to spend it wisely.


Having said that if I was the Liverpool money man I'd want to have control over where my huge amount of money was going.

Mick Mack, I was one of the Liverpool fans that initially said "it can't all be down to Suarez", but it became more and more obvious that it was Suarez who had gotten the best out of Sterling and others.


But yes, I can totally believe that he helped Suarez with his game, and Steven Gerrard once said Rogers was the best man manager he'd worked with and he wished he could have worked with him earlier.


So I'd say a good signing.

Joey Barton will be 34 in September. I had no idea. Not too old obviously but given that I though Scott Brown was getting old (he turns out to be about to turn only 31) Barton is defo getting on a bit.

Roy Keane bossed the Rangers midfield at age 34, but Joey's no Roy Keane (red cards part)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Joey Barton will be 34 in September. I had no

> idea. Not too old obviously but given that I

> though Scott Brown was getting old (he turns out

> to be about to turn only 31) Barton is defo

> getting on a bit.

> Roy Keane bossed the Rangers midfield at age 34,

> but Joey's no Roy Keane (red cards part)


He did? In all 10 games he played for them?

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SCSB79 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Parkdrive Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Otta Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > Yep, bit of a cock, but he can definitely

> > > play.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > A bit????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > >

> > >

> > > Haha, okay a complete cock.

> >

> > And he is our complete cock now. Keeps the

> head

> > screwed like the last season and he will run

> amok.

>

>

> Alternatively a cynic might argue that he didn't

> think he could cut in the premier league, and

> jumped ship as soon as he could. The Premier

> league will be all the poorer for the lack of his

> wonderful philosophical musings.


Did you watch the entire interview? Explains pretty well why he didn't fancy another shot in the premiership.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I couldn't watch the whole interview. I was

> immensely in under a minute. I reckon what it

> really boiled down to is Rangers offered him more

> money. All the rest is bullshit. End of.


Im in suspense....immensely what :)


Edited to add a smiley in case you called me a cunt again.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I couldn't watch the whole interview. I was

> > immensely in under a minute. I reckon what it

> > really boiled down to is Rangers offered him

> more

> > money. All the rest is bullshit. End of.

>

> Im in suspense....immensely what :)

>

> Edited to add a smiley in case you called me a

> @#$%& again.


Oops! Immensely bored.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Quite right Scholesy, don't listen to Mick, he

> > knows nothing about football...

>

> He is stealing your lines RD. You should have

> copyrighted that one.


I tried to, but someone else owns my image rights. My super agent is dealing with it now as I write...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry but I think it's best if people just check things for themselves when they buy things. In three shops/restaurants (from some years back) I just avoid the places concerned, as in all three  cases I was pretty sure it wasn't a genuine mistake, and in one place  it happened more than once and usually late at night.
    • Sorry Sue - me again. This has been on my mind all day, it's a big bug bear of mine. If you don't mind - please can you private message me some of these shops so I can cross reference / add to my AVOID list.  Thanks in advance. Let's make sure this doesn't happen this Christmas, particularly as we head into sales season. Even more problematic in my experience.
    • Pity you didn't quote what you are referring to, Mal. I didn't see the previous post, and my mind is boggling 😮
    • The Cherry Tree was absolutely excellent for a while when a youngish couple ran it and brought in a really good chef. It was them who renamed it The Cherry Tree. They were really turning it around. The chef did fantastic Scotch eggs, and one of the best roasts I've ever had. If memory serves the then owner,  for some reason known only to himself, took a dislike to them and what they were doing and sacked them all. And yes we weren't expecting a top class  meal last Christmas, and we left it too late to book anywhere else, but we weren't expecting it for a hundred pounds EACH to be quite as terrible as it was. Stupid us. Not sure why you are confused by my post, Jazzer? Did I misremember? Now it's got even more confusing because my posts have been merged and your confused emoji is shown at the bottom of the second one instead of the first 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...