Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was interested (Otta) in the Suarez insight into how a manager manages and improves players.

I was interested in how this sits with those who have given so much credit for Liverpool's near miss to Suarez, whilst Suarez now gives much of the credit for his development to Rodgers.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Otta Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Yep, bit of a cock, but he can definitely

> > play.

> > >

> > >

> > > A bit????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> >

> >

> > Haha, okay a complete cock.

>

> And he is our complete cock now. Keeps the head

> screwed like the last season and he will run amok.



Alternatively a cynic might argue that he didn't think he could cut in the premier league, and jumped ship as soon as he could. The Premier league will be all the poorer for the lack of his wonderful philosophical musings.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wasn't there a 'transfer committee'?...

>

>

> Of which he was a part of, no?


Yes, if there was this 'transfer committee' he would've been part of it, but your initial post implied they were his signings alone,whereas the reality may be that he didn't want certain players but had to bow down to the majority decision...

Agreed RD - Ronny Deila at Celtic, was quoted as saying "I said yes to every signing" - that's a far cry from being in any way in control of signings.


Rodgers has already said Lawell and Desmond have supported him on transfer policy - I'm guessing he feels slightly stung by the Liverpool experience and it was an important part of the Celtic discussions that he will have some autonomy. I hope so anyway - there wont be a lot of money, so he needs to spend it wisely.


Having said that if I was the Liverpool money man I'd want to have control over where my huge amount of money was going.

Mick Mack, I was one of the Liverpool fans that initially said "it can't all be down to Suarez", but it became more and more obvious that it was Suarez who had gotten the best out of Sterling and others.


But yes, I can totally believe that he helped Suarez with his game, and Steven Gerrard once said Rogers was the best man manager he'd worked with and he wished he could have worked with him earlier.


So I'd say a good signing.

Joey Barton will be 34 in September. I had no idea. Not too old obviously but given that I though Scott Brown was getting old (he turns out to be about to turn only 31) Barton is defo getting on a bit.

Roy Keane bossed the Rangers midfield at age 34, but Joey's no Roy Keane (red cards part)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Joey Barton will be 34 in September. I had no

> idea. Not too old obviously but given that I

> though Scott Brown was getting old (he turns out

> to be about to turn only 31) Barton is defo

> getting on a bit.

> Roy Keane bossed the Rangers midfield at age 34,

> but Joey's no Roy Keane (red cards part)


He did? In all 10 games he played for them?

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SCSB79 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Parkdrive Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Otta Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > Yep, bit of a cock, but he can definitely

> > > play.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > A bit????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > >

> > >

> > > Haha, okay a complete cock.

> >

> > And he is our complete cock now. Keeps the

> head

> > screwed like the last season and he will run

> amok.

>

>

> Alternatively a cynic might argue that he didn't

> think he could cut in the premier league, and

> jumped ship as soon as he could. The Premier

> league will be all the poorer for the lack of his

> wonderful philosophical musings.


Did you watch the entire interview? Explains pretty well why he didn't fancy another shot in the premiership.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I couldn't watch the whole interview. I was

> immensely in under a minute. I reckon what it

> really boiled down to is Rangers offered him more

> money. All the rest is bullshit. End of.


Im in suspense....immensely what :)


Edited to add a smiley in case you called me a cunt again.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I couldn't watch the whole interview. I was

> > immensely in under a minute. I reckon what it

> > really boiled down to is Rangers offered him

> more

> > money. All the rest is bullshit. End of.

>

> Im in suspense....immensely what :)

>

> Edited to add a smiley in case you called me a

> @#$%& again.


Oops! Immensely bored.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Quite right Scholesy, don't listen to Mick, he

> > knows nothing about football...

>

> He is stealing your lines RD. You should have

> copyrighted that one.


I tried to, but someone else owns my image rights. My super agent is dealing with it now as I write...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If anyone had half an ounce of intelligence they would vote for the Green Party or a real socialist alternative. I have never, and will never back a bunch of ‘champagne socialists’ who have not done a single positive thing for work class people.    Louisa. 
    • That the leaders of our country are wealthy people comes as a shock to you? How ridiculous.  Why shouldn’t they be living in those houses?  
    • No such thing as a “witch hunt” against a taxpayer funded public figure. Especially someone in charge of finances.    It is the responsibility of a landlord to ensure the agent acting on their behalf has done everything required to validate a tenancy. And to double check that too. Stop justifying it as some sort of ‘oversight’ purely down to the agent.    Also, I’d question the socialist credentials of a Labour chancellor owning a beautiful detached house on a private estate close to the edge of Dulwich Village. Great Brownings, according to some media outlets. What a s**tshow.    Louisa.    https://southwarknews.co.uk/area/dulwich/southwark-faces-calls-to-take-action-against-chancellor-rachel-reeves-who-is-accused-of-breaking-housing-rules-when-renting-out-dulwich-home/
    • Was the property in one the wards Southwark added last November? It would be a bit harsh if it was and Southwark didn’t notify residents and landlords. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...