Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

diable rouge

diable rouge

Posted
Posted

The grotesque underhand tactics of the CSL come as no surprise.


Most of the 'Big 6' long ago sold their soul to the world of franchise and stuck two fingers up to tradition when changing their original names, and in some cases, upped sticks to pastures new, leaving their fanbase emotionally distraught and homeless.


Mockney Piers Dons, so much to answer for...

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted
This 'new rule' for the CSL is akin to scrapping the offside law or taking a free kick to yourself. This is not the game of 'hundreds' we grew to love over the years. The 'fans' will soon get bored of it. Meanwhile, I will be reporting this thread to the VAR (Value at Risk) committee where I fully expect the rogue post to be reported to Admin for potential deletion.
maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

The CSL is delighted to welcome back those rogue (or misguided) members who sought to take part in a breakaway thread (or 'a malumbu' as it is known in the game) which is now confidently expected to collapse. We at the CSL have always believed in the integrity of the FF and hope future attempts to establish rival threads will now not be attempted.


We have assured fams of this thread of its continuing and can only assume that "The game of hundreds we grew to love over the years" does not include the previous attempted breakaway by this member with his short-lived 73 game.


Also, somewhere Laddy Muck is screaming blue red murder

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'The Derry City Story' is on BBCi player. It's

> worth a watch. Well, I enjoyed it.


More than worth it doc, I thought it was brilliant - 'Different League' shows what football can really mean to a community.

malumbu

malumbu

Posted
Posted

The Derry City documentary is excellent, although they had a bit of an up and down history subsequent to being reformed. I worry that the documentary hides some of the secretarian issues that surrounded the original demise - although that is for a separate thread.


On fan power not sure why some had to get into Old Trafford last night. On my one visit in the 00s it felt that there were still some hard core fans who were still after a fight after the match. A little uncomfortable and took me back to the 70s when there was always bother when Man U came to town. Maybe I am being unfair and many clubs still have a hooli element.

malumbu

malumbu

Posted
Posted
On the odd occasion I've been to the new place the 'hoolis' all seem to be hipsters. At the Boleyn they were more old school although I remember the Phil Mitchell incident (genuine banter between the away end and the old boys in the Chicken Run). Are you said Phil Mitchell lookalike quids?
  • 2 weeks later...
diable rouge

diable rouge

Posted
Posted

So much to love about yesterday's FA Cup final.


The romance of the Cup was back with Leicester winning it for the first time.


A world class goal and save, and even VAR played its role.


The 'good' guys beating the 'bad' guys, especially apt as is was against one of the ESL 6, greedy owners that sought to deprive clubs like Leicester from achieving their dreams.


Proof that a club can have foreign ownership yet connect with its fanbase, furthering its role at the heart of a community, a club that can be well run and successful without sportswashing or leveraged debt.


And of course, fans being back, something we took for granted and underestimated how important they are to the spirit of the game. Football is nothing without the fans...

malumbu

malumbu

Posted
Posted

Pleased that Leicester won, but thought another shocking decision by VAR, if a player is level using the naked eye (real time or on the screen review) then the goal should stand. Don't use lines down to a few mm's. Couldn't be bothered to watch the analysis so others may have different opinions.


To contradict myself very happy with goal line technology, apart from it failing and (Sot) Villa staying up last season.

diable rouge

diable rouge

Posted
Posted

It was the constant griping from players/managers/fans/pundits and TV slo-mo analysis about refs/assistant refs getting 'naked eye' decisions wrong that brought about VAR in the first place.

Asking VAR to make the same 'naked eye' decisions surely defeats the purpose. Once you bring in an arbitrary rule you get lots of inconsistencies, which leads to lots of griping.

You will always need some 'line in the sand' that can't be crossed. If it shouldn't be down to a few mm's, how far should it be for it to be called offside?

Goal line technology works because it's quick, it's easy to monitor as you're dealing with fixed points in a confined zone, unfortunately that can't be transferred to the vast open pitch...yet.

I'm in favour of scrapping VAR but everyone then needs to accept refs will make mistakes...

malumbu

malumbu

Posted
Posted

The decision should be what's in the interest of the game. I'm pretty sure that in the past for offside there had to be some clear blue water between attacker and defender, otherwise the benefit of the doubt went with the former. More goals, more excitement. But of course not infallible, due to official error.


Putting that on screen so the official can see in real time whether a 'reasonable person' could decide whether the goal scorer or others were clearly offside would be a way forward. Of course decisions would vary but there again Liverpool were gifted two key decisions on Sunday that another official would have given the other way.


Don't get me started on the player having a hand or a nose in an offside position, that really is getting silly and favours the defending team as they will naturally lean towards the other goal, and vice versa.

  • 2 weeks later...
malumbu

malumbu

Posted
Posted

Any Chels fans embarrassed about your celebrity fan? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57355599


There is no mention of Gove's pastimes and hobbies in wiki, although a reference to a Grauniad article that says he is a Hoops fan. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/may/19/diary-michael-white-wembley-qpr-derby


Well I suppose it could be worse, Cameron supports the Hammers, Villa, Burnley and Scunthorpe - the last pretty appropriate when you think along the lines of John Cooper Clarke.

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hughp
      Plumber recommendation - A.F.E Plumbing Services

      By Hughp · Posted

      Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • march46
      Where can you smell Wood Burning stoves in East Dulwich

      By march46 · Posted

      A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • malumbu
      Advice on dealing with a solicitor who will not use modern means of communication

      By malumbu · Posted

      A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • malumbu
      Selective licensing for rentals extended

      By malumbu · Posted

      Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...