Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Given that was Ozil's first game in the PL,

> what's

> > your point? Every player is 'unproven' in the

> PL

> > before they have played a game if you think

> > football in one league is so different to that

> in

> > another.

>

> My point? Really, you need to ask? I mention it

> because of the inane comments that some have made

> on here. He's class and showed why he's one of the

> top 10 players in the world. Is that a good enough

> point for you or do need more?

> The fact that he was outstanding in La Liga says

> it all, the quality of the football is far better

> than the Prem and he shone over there as he did

> today. Its called consistency Alan. Oh and class.


Since when did Sunderland become the benchmark for the quality of the Premier League?

Last time I looked they were bottom.

If a player hasn't played in a league, then it's perfectly reasonable to say he's unproven in that league. Messi is unproven in the PL. Bale is unproven in La Liga, etc, etc.

Any 'class' and 'consistency' a player has shown in another league is no guarantee that he will be successful in the PL, e.g. Veron, Shevchenko, Robinho etc, etc.

Let's assume your 'fact' that the quality of La Liga is better than the PL, technically anyway, as most foreign players admit how much quicker and physical the PL is compared to foreign leagues. Will Ozil have come up against clodhoppers like Huth and Shawcross before? He has to prove himself against that type of player. Lots of other factors to consider too, e.g. climate, culture, food, more vocal fans, a mid-week League Cup away game on a frozen pitch at Barnsley.

If he isn't a success in the PL, it doesn't mean that he isn't a great player, just that his game isn't suited to the PL...

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> with Carroll now out until at least Christmas I've

> got a feeling today's boring draw at Saints will

> be as good as it gets. Still - at least we now

> have Fulham reject (5 goals in 23 apps) Petric to

> shoulder the striking burden - hurrah.


*Hands over telescopic rifle to maxxi...*

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan Medic Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Given that was Ozil's first game in the PL,

> > what's

> > > your point? Every player is 'unproven' in the

> > PL

> > > before they have played a game if you think

> > > football in one league is so different to

> that

> > in

> > > another.

> >

> > My point? Really, you need to ask? I mention it

> > because of the inane comments that some have

> made

> > on here. He's class and showed why he's one of

> the

> > top 10 players in the world. Is that a good

> enough

> > point for you or do need more?

> > The fact that he was outstanding in La Liga

> says

> > it all, the quality of the football is far

> better

> > than the Prem and he shone over there as he did

> > today. Its called consistency Alan. Oh and

> class.

>

> Since when did Sunderland become the benchmark for

> the quality of the Premier League?

> Last time I looked they were bottom.

> If a player hasn't played in a league, then it's

> perfectly reasonable to say he's unproven in that

> league. Messi is unproven in the PL. Bale is

> unproven in La Liga, etc, etc.

> Any 'class' and 'consistency' a player has shown

> in another league is no guarantee that he will be

> successful in the PL, e.g. Veron, Shevchenko,

> Robinho etc, etc.

> Let's assume your 'fact' that the quality of La

> Liga is better than the PL, technically anyway, as

> most foreign players admit how much quicker and

> physical the PL is compared to foreign leagues.

> Will Ozil have come up against clodhoppers like

> Huth and Shawcross before? He has to prove himself

> against that type of player. Lots of other factors

> to consider too, e.g. climate, culture, food, more

> vocal fans, a mid-week League Cup away game on a

> frozen pitch at Barnsley.

> If he isn't a success in the PL, it doesn't mean

> that he isn't a great player, just that his game

> isn't suited to the PL...



RD did you ever mention these factors when the likes of Ronaldo et al came to Prem, or was your opinion coloured by the fact that he was playing for united? I don't recall you bringing this up when the likes of Oscar, Ramires, Hazard,Aguero,Silva and numerous other johnny foreigners came to the Prem. Or is it just a United anti Arsenal bias coming to the fore. By the way Sunderland has more than its fair share of clod hoppers, and I have to say i don't share your pessimism in respect of the little man. We shall see.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to be fair I don't think he was being pessimistic

> at all, he was just being a bit pedantic.

> That he is literally unproven in this league and

> it's probably worth reserving judgement for a few

> games, and maybe at least one winter.


I think it was the usual anti Arsenal thing as I don't recall him ever making such comments in respect of foreign players who've joined other clubs, just saying. And by the way he played in Germany for a few years so the winter thing doesn't wash.

Well actualy when Ronaldo came to the PL he was not anywhere near the player he is now or was when he left the PL. He was younger than Ozil of course. But if Ozil was so good would Madrid let him go? Maybe they were trying to balance the books.


As for anti Arsenal remarks you need to look at your own comments PD which highlighted MU's good fortune against Palace but no mention of the Arse's against Sunderland. What I dislike about football fans in general is that they are so one eyed about their club and even that is blinkered.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> El Pibe Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > to be fair I don't think he was being

> pessimistic

> > at all, he was just being a bit pedantic.

> > That he is literally unproven in this league

> and

> > it's probably worth reserving judgement for a

> few

> > games, and maybe at least one winter.

>

> I think it was the usual anti Arsenal thing as I

> don't recall him ever making such comments in

> respect of foreign players who've joined other

> clubs...


Maybe that's because no one was banging on about how great they were going to be...

When I turned on the radio this morning (after a very early night) I was actually delighted to hear Chelsea lost. I don't think I'd feel like that about any other team unless it was a result affecting the team I support. I suppose I mustn't like them much.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, looking forward to Everton game with brand new

> striking saviour Mladen Petric (brought to the

> club because Carroll is not yet fit to play and C.

> Cole's return was ruled out as he was not fit to

> play) who is... not yet fit enough to play. ha

> bloody haaa.



*Points maxxi in the direction of WHU training ground and nearest grassy knoll...*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello We are looking to get a dog of 1 year plus - know how hard puppy training is and want to avoid it! Also keen to know dog’s personality before we jump in as friends have had very difficult experiences with puppies who turned out to be tricky.  Ideally would like to adopt but also open to buying - does anyone have any ideas of where one might buy a dog?  thanks in advance! 
    • I think you have been very kind towards the the council.  And even kinder in your description of Peckham High Street (LOL). Peckham High Street Rye Lane is awful.  I know it is a very controversial opinion   but I am happy that some parts are going to developed and re built.   The dirty pavements, graffiti shops that put their stock all over pavements and racing cyclists make it not an enjoyable place to be in.  In the old days any business would have to keep their premises in good order.   I am much happier being near a simple bit of over greenery or weed.   It is much cleaner and feels safer to be next to.   Some parts of Peckham are plagued by Zombie like people who have fallen prey to substance abuse.  And I don't see the council putting much effort into helping these poor lost souls.
    • Our refuse collectors leave rubbish all the way down the hill after they have emptied the bins. Everywhere you go you see rubbish everywhere. On some days walking through the high street in Peckham can be truly depressing with plastic bags and paper blowing around everywhere, Peckham and other streets deserve better than this Council complacency. I'm sure it wasn't so bad back in the day. Councils everywhere, faced with cuts in revenue, must have decided a long time ago  that litter picking  and rubbish collection were not so important. I think a clean, tidy environment makes everyone feel better about their home environment. Btw, I'm ok with a few weeds. They are just wild flowers in an inconvenient place.
    • Have just enjoyed watching 100s of cyclists go past on Peckham Rye west. Couple of penny farthings, lit up bikes and music too!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...