Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Was introduced to some new people last night and the conversation turned to football.


Why do people look embarrassed when they say they support West Ham.


Why do the others then look at him sympathetically.


Why do people try to convince said WH supporter that there is a lot of excitement in getting relegated and promoted randomly.


The west ham conversation always seems to go the same way.

in reality, West Ham are also seen as a bit old school and 'Essex', as with all these things there is some truth in that. No-one in SE22 gonna think those things of someone who supports Arsenal or Chelsea.


Plus Mick, you look like a Bushwacker so they are a bit wary in your prescense

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wouldn't you feel embarrassed if your ground

> looked like Legoland?...

>

> http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/ii144/littlesth

> 0b0/Untitled-4.jpg



Haha! I can't help shaking my head every time I walk past the ground and see those towers.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Why do people look embarrassed when they say they

> support West Ham.


Because they know some nearby idiot will look all puzzled at why someone wouldn't support Man U/Man C/Chels/Arse etc.


> Why do the others then look at him

> sympathetically.


Because they usually support Man U/Man C/Chels/Arse etc.


> Why do people try to convince said WH supporter

> that there is a lot of excitement in getting

> relegated and promoted randomly.


There is, THERE IS! We get a chance to go to Wemberlee and everyfing.


> The west ham conversation always seems to go the

> same way.


Only in certain circles (see above).

Maxii, hit's a bit of a note there. Northeners, and supporters of 'propa' teams tend to look as you as a proper supporter rather than a 'fan', when you say you support West Ham. Twats at work who 'support' Arsenal, Man U and Chelsea and live in Weybridge don't have a scooby

The towers ARE, rightly, a source of embarrassment and help with crowd control. It's hard to surge mob-handed up Green Street with intent, chasing the opposition who were let out early, when you have a giant play-fort at your back.




They also serve to keep us humble when get a bit of a swagger on.


Well, okay, IF we get a bit of a swagger on.

PD I was about to (and still will) post on here fair play to Arsenal. By far the better team today and thoroughly deserved the win. I don't honestly believe that Liverpool turned up and got beat though, I just think we were shit today.


That all said, I hadn't said a word against Arsenal this season, and after your typical reaction, I'm just going to sit back and enjoy watching them fade like a fart in a hurricane LIKE THEY DO EVERY YEAR.


Enjoy.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought the ref made a poor decision not to

> allow Liverpool take a quick free kick when it

> could/should have led to a goal. Might have

> affected the outcome of the game.


The same ref did the same thing when the same Arsenal player did the same 'tackle' in the game at Sunderland. At least he's consistent...

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually, I'm flattered he thinks we're a top

> team.


I ws being facetious even your own manager doesn't think you're a top team. He was saying AFTER we'd played you that we'd not been tested. Says a lot about what he thinks about his own charges. I have to say if AVB was born in a field of clues, had them for breakfast, lunch and dinner he still wouldn't have a scooby. Allowing someone possibly concussed to carry on playing is the equivalent of handing a blike his car keys when he's been out on the piss and saying carry on. Team progess Jah? A bit like us then. Good to see your top signings are banging the goals in though. That Soldado Pen bloke is proving to be especially effective.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought the ref made a poor decision not to

> allow Liverpool take a quick free kick when it

> could/should have led to a goal. Might have

> affected the outcome of the game.



And if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle. Arteta shouldn't have been sent off against Palace but he was. Love Red Devil questioning ref decsions, coming from a Yanited fan that is hilarious. Like they've never been on the end of favourable decisions.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bull. China. Shop. All present and correct in your

> invective, PD. No change there. Do carry on

> though. It gives us all a bit of laugh on a rather

> dull Monday.


Oh dear, hit a nerve haven't I? Us? You mean the usual suspects, RD, you and Alan Medic? Not as much we laugh at Spurs old boy. But I hope AVB stays on he's good for a laugh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...