Jump to content

Recommended Posts

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 80 quid.

> watching desperately miserable midweek football or

> about 54 pints (between us) with me old muckers

> jah and park?

> Easy choice!!!!!!!!


Feck! I've made a mistake. There isn't a game at the Hamlet until the new year. Bugger!

So he gets a raise until next time he decides he wants out.


Nah, I'm feeling good about Saurez for more than his play at the moment. He looks happy, and he seems to have turned a corner. But I do wonder what the clubs get out of these contracts, because they still seem to mean nothing if a player wants away.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> From the Beeb...

>

> Chairman Mehmet Dalman has a preferred candidate

> to succeed the 41-year-old and Tan's permission to

> strike a deal.

>

> The target is understood to be a household name at

> another British club.

>

> maxxi, it couldn't, could it?...



Not it's saying "Dalman has a preferred candidate to replace Mackay should he be dismissed - the manager is a high-profile name currently in work outside the UK."


So BFS will be remaining at the Boleyn.

Otta Wrote:


> Not it's saying "Dalman has a preferred candidate

> to replace Mackay should he be dismissed - the

> manager is a high-profile name currently in work

> outside the UK."

>

> So BFS will be remaining at the Boleyn.


Sneaky update by the Beeb.

Nevermind Hammers, I'm sure it's only a matter of time, 4.50pm tomorrow perchance...


http://p.twimg.com/AtQ6doGCMAA6tbj.jpg:large

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So he gets a raise until next time he decides he

> wants out.

>

> Nah, I'm feeling good about Saurez for more than

> his play at the moment. He looks happy, and he

> seems to have turned a corner. But I do wonder

> what the clubs get out of these contracts, because

> they still seem to mean nothing if a player wants

> away.


As he will to Madrid in the summer for around 50 to 60 million or more. All liverpool have done is bump up his price tag. Such is football these days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...