Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well look at Palace. Pulis is a hero I expect for rescuing a team from certain relegation. He left Stoke because they were bored with PL mid tableness. This West Ham academy of football is now a myth. When did you last play up to your expectations? Frankly Man City play the football we like now and we know why. Money. They can buy great players and have a manager who can mould them into a team.


After that there are clubs who aren't quite there yet and who may never be. Liverpool and Everton are examples. Arsenal,Chelsea & United will improve. But WH's aims are to stay in the PL. If moving to the Olympic Stadium changes their profile then maybe they too can hope for top 4 status. However, only one team can win the league and finishing 4th shouldn't be any consolation. I blame UEFA for that.

West ham are a bigger team than palace and stoke in terms of resources, support and heritage ( academy or not), we should be aspiring to more than them. BFS can,t even attract decent players to us, his tactics are one dimensional he,s made a hash of transfers with a pretty good budget, he's been rude about our support....where do we start on what a failure he,s been for long term progress for west ham, especially this season. A lucky play off victory, thanks Sam now fuck off.


I still think we,ll be lucky to stay up this season.

Too big a gap imo. With City and Chelsea playing each other, Liverpool could also close the gap on one or both of them.

I still think Liverpool will have a big say in who does/doesn't win the League, as they have to play the top 3 at home, where their record is very good...

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Just remember Parkdrive, Ryan Giggs has won

> more

> > titles than Arsenal F.C.

>

> And this is relevant to Yaniteds current form

> because?


It isn't. It just the sort of crap you would write if you were me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
    • A quick Google says that it is not undersubscribed unlike many subject schools so those claims mentioned above may not be true. Last Ofsted was good.  You are definitely right about the money. This is what trusts do. Remove word ‘subject’ above Remove word ‘subject’ above I can’t edit my ridiculous errors but would like to apologise  for messy post
    • I have heard claims that people don't send their children there because of the name of the school..?  I genuinely cannot get my head around this one. The school is named after the road it is on which is named after the history of the area!  'Grove Primary School' is potentially the most boring name they could have come up with, and for a school struggling financially, is rebranding the school really the best use of funds? 
    • Certainly unique, can't argue with that.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...