Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bottom line is, a man of fairness would have

> realised why his actions might have led others to

> misinterpret and would have had the grace to

> apologise and see where events went from there


Perhaps, but equally a man who has decided incorrectly that he has been accused of something would be big enough to realise that and move on, no?

I think he did move on


but pointing out that today you are posting overly-aggressive posts on multiple threads on a lovely spring day is unrelated to the previous incident


But again, instead of taking a breath and going "am I?" you barely pause before saying "am I fook!" and plough on regardless


just chill a bit is all people are saying

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think he did move on

>

> but pointing out that today you are posting

> overly-aggressive posts on multiple threads on a

> lovely spring day is unrelated to the previous

> incident

>

> But again, instead of taking a breath and going

> "am I?" you barely pause before saying "am I

> fook!" and plough on regardless

>

> just chill a bit is all people are saying



By calling me names he's moved on? Ok right. Clearly I'm the one who needs to chill

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> given you have been banned MULTIPLE times from the

> forum in the past, the name calling may not be

> grown-up but it has basis in truth

>

> Why don't you try and show him to be wrong instead

> of acting like a 12 year old


If you must know I sent him a polite PM asking to lay off the name calling nad he said that I hadn't apologised, again I've not accused the man of anything, and that I had spoilt his enjoyment of the forum and "to do one". Don't say I didn'y at least try.

over the years I have had my share of run ins with our quids - and one thing I've learned is that if he believes he is being accused of racism it aggravates him mightily


I remember one thread where he deemed something I wrote to be accusatory along those lines - and when I reread it I saw why. And publicy apologised to him on the forum. Job done. Line drawn


leaving you and he aside - as a general rule, if it kicks off publicly on a thread between people, then I think amends have to be public as well. Otherwise yer average reader is going to have a different impression of what went down

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If you've got a problem message me privately.

> You've accused me of calling you a racisr, which

> was bollocks, and then had the nerve to call me a

> K*nt.


Surely PD best just to apologise for what was perhaps a misunderstanding and move on?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > If you've got a problem message me privately.

> > You've accused me of calling you a racisr,

> which

> > was bollocks, and then had the nerve to call me

> a

> > K*nt.

>

> Surely PD best just to apologise for what was

> perhaps a misunderstanding and move on?


In order to set matters, hopefully, right I apologise to ???? for the incident. I certainly wasn't referring to him as a racist, nor was I trying to offend him. Not sure what else I can say.

I missed last nights match, but all the comments I was reading on the beeb basically said Arsenal had 10 men fighting bravely, and they had Ozil.


He has undoubted quality, and I know you didn't buy him to stick his boot in, but you must be a bit concerned about his apparent lack of interest or fight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • By now you’ve hopefully seen that our main demonstration against Trump’s state visit is in London on Wednesday. Many of you have also asked, though, about how you can help ‘welcome’ Donald Trump to Windsor when he arrives there tomorrow (Tuesday) evening. So here’s the plan: We’re asking you to come and line Windsor High Street tomorrow in a peaceful, static protest.  Time: 6pm, Tue 16 Sept Location: Assemble outside Windsor Parish Church, High St, Windsor SL4 1LS and then spread out along the High Street. Grab some cardboard and a pen and make a homemade sign to show Donald Trump and his supporters what you think of them!  The world’s media will be in Windsor to cover the state visit, so showing visually that he is not welcome will send an important message far and wide. If you are coming then please join this Signal chat group for important updates.     Protest safety Please buddy up and come with someone else You have a right to peacefully demonstrate, but we are expecting a high police presence. Remain non-violent and non-confrontational, and do not talk to the police. It may be better to dress inconspicuously, not like an ‘activist’ We plan on ending at 7.30pm. Please leave in groups of 5–10 and make sure you have a bust card This action is entirely legal but we still recommend that you read this key advice when going on a protest to know your rights. Remember:  No comment No personal details Ask ‘under what power?’ No duty solicitor Don’t accept a caution Here is the protest support line: 07946 541 511 and here is more information on Stop & Search under the Public Order Act.   Thank you for being part of the movement against Trump. In solidarity, Stop Trump Coalition
    • We booked a day when we could drop around 8 bags. They directed us to use the rear entrance on Carver Rd. I would definitely ring as they don’t seem to have much space at the back. Our experience was great, they were very polite and thankful.
    • https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/15/police-search-for-11-violent-disorder-suspects-after-unite-the-kingdom-march
    • Should we change the title to Is Starmer toast? The real infighting is just starting: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgy79yr74do
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...