Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The same Rangers that Mike Ashley is trying to up

> his stake in. Looking forward to that future SCSB?



That's the one.

And no, not at all.

He's in it for one thing and that's not the benefit of the football club.

I don't know if this is good or bad really.....


Celtic and Arsenal hold top positions in a new football financial strength league of 44 European clubs devised by S&P Capital IQ. While Celtic top the league, Glasgow rivals Rangers are bottom and are held up as an example of how things can go wrong on and off the pitch.


Apart from Celtic, only Ajax get ahead of Arsenal in the table based on a range of debt and financial performance indicators, but the North London side are ahead of Bayern Munich and Manchester United (ranked fourth). Not surprisingly, S&P Capital IQ suggest that Arsenal's financial stability may be related to its unwillingness to 'buy' success by spending heavily on transfers

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if this is good or bad really.....

>

> Celtic and Arsenal hold top positions in a new

> football financial strength league of 44 European

> clubs devised by S&P Capital IQ. While Celtic top

> the league, Glasgow rivals Rangers are bottom and

> are held up as an example of how things can go

> wrong on and off the pitch.

>

> Apart from Celtic, only Ajax get ahead of Arsenal

> in the table based on a range of debt and

> financial performance indicators, but the North

> London side are ahead of Bayern Munich and

> Manchester United (ranked fourth). Not

> surprisingly, S&P Capital IQ suggest that

> Arsenal's financial stability may be related to

> its unwillingness to 'buy' success by spending

> heavily on transfers



Imagine that, the Arsenal have a sustainable businesss model.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The only thing I've ever grudginly liked about

> him

> > was this statement he made a few years back.

> >

> > ?To be honest I never cared much for Manchester

> > United fans. For the most part they?re clueless

> > glory hunters, trying to add a sense of

> > accomplishment to their own pointless lives by

> > jumping on the bandwagon of a successful

> sporting

> > club, in many cases on the other side of the

> > world?

> >

> > That from a Yanited "legend"

>

> 0/10

> It's a well known fake quote...



Of course it is, he's still coming out with some pearlers about the rags, must have a book to sell, don't you think and doubtless that will be crammed with lies.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blimey, quietly scathing. Also rather undermine's

> Keane's point about AF criticising players in his

> book!!



RK left Utd because he criticised players, remember the MUTV rant? I don't think there's a Utd fan who doesn't think he's being hypocritical on this point. Quietly scathing, but nonetheless slagging someone off for being slagged off. Two wrongs and all that. Somehow I don't think RK will lose any sleep about comments from a journeyman footballer no one has heard off...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    • It took the Tories 14 years to dig that 20bn blackhole. It's taken Labour 14 months to double it.  You cant get rid of Reeves though because the next person will actually be totally incompetent. There are no MPs in Labour capable of performing better than the current shower.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...