Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The same Rangers that Mike Ashley is trying to up

> his stake in. Looking forward to that future SCSB?



That's the one.

And no, not at all.

He's in it for one thing and that's not the benefit of the football club.

I don't know if this is good or bad really.....


Celtic and Arsenal hold top positions in a new football financial strength league of 44 European clubs devised by S&P Capital IQ. While Celtic top the league, Glasgow rivals Rangers are bottom and are held up as an example of how things can go wrong on and off the pitch.


Apart from Celtic, only Ajax get ahead of Arsenal in the table based on a range of debt and financial performance indicators, but the North London side are ahead of Bayern Munich and Manchester United (ranked fourth). Not surprisingly, S&P Capital IQ suggest that Arsenal's financial stability may be related to its unwillingness to 'buy' success by spending heavily on transfers

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if this is good or bad really.....

>

> Celtic and Arsenal hold top positions in a new

> football financial strength league of 44 European

> clubs devised by S&P Capital IQ. While Celtic top

> the league, Glasgow rivals Rangers are bottom and

> are held up as an example of how things can go

> wrong on and off the pitch.

>

> Apart from Celtic, only Ajax get ahead of Arsenal

> in the table based on a range of debt and

> financial performance indicators, but the North

> London side are ahead of Bayern Munich and

> Manchester United (ranked fourth). Not

> surprisingly, S&P Capital IQ suggest that

> Arsenal's financial stability may be related to

> its unwillingness to 'buy' success by spending

> heavily on transfers



Imagine that, the Arsenal have a sustainable businesss model.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The only thing I've ever grudginly liked about

> him

> > was this statement he made a few years back.

> >

> > ?To be honest I never cared much for Manchester

> > United fans. For the most part they?re clueless

> > glory hunters, trying to add a sense of

> > accomplishment to their own pointless lives by

> > jumping on the bandwagon of a successful

> sporting

> > club, in many cases on the other side of the

> > world?

> >

> > That from a Yanited "legend"

>

> 0/10

> It's a well known fake quote...



Of course it is, he's still coming out with some pearlers about the rags, must have a book to sell, don't you think and doubtless that will be crammed with lies.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blimey, quietly scathing. Also rather undermine's

> Keane's point about AF criticising players in his

> book!!



RK left Utd because he criticised players, remember the MUTV rant? I don't think there's a Utd fan who doesn't think he's being hypocritical on this point. Quietly scathing, but nonetheless slagging someone off for being slagged off. Two wrongs and all that. Somehow I don't think RK will lose any sleep about comments from a journeyman footballer no one has heard off...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They used to have dedicated park wardens, who I'm sure used to look after the parks and locked and opened the gates. Years ago I knew someone who was one. I thought they were based in that hut by the toilets. Are they not there any more? The community wardens are attached to the police rather than a specific park, aren't they?
    • Yes, sad how Rye Lane has taken a dive, interesting to see those pics CPR Dave. It's shocking how the section between Choumert Road and the Nag's Head in particular has lost its vibrancy, meanwhile the next section to the top of Peckham Rye Common has gentrified. Wonder why such a distinction in fortunes? Anyway the station square plans have fallen behind yet again, demolition won't now start this summer. The only "work" that will now take place this summer is surveying of the arcade, which they've had 10 years since planning permission to do. At least the replacement TSB branch has progressed but the Blenheim Grove corner building still looks unfinished, despite claims it "is now complete". https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/current-and-future-development/peckham-and-nunhead-2
    • DKH was two form entry, it is now one form entry to cope with the fact it was far more under subscribed than other schools in the area. They had actually combined year groups into single classes, 3/4 and 5/6.  When a school changes name, it’s usually because of a bad reputation perhaps the results.  The new name is dry with no history unlike its current name. It’s a very sketchy decision. It’s an expensive vanity project for someone.  What  will happen if the name change does not increase applications to the school?     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...