Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The same Rangers that Mike Ashley is trying to up

> his stake in. Looking forward to that future SCSB?



That's the one.

And no, not at all.

He's in it for one thing and that's not the benefit of the football club.

I don't know if this is good or bad really.....


Celtic and Arsenal hold top positions in a new football financial strength league of 44 European clubs devised by S&P Capital IQ. While Celtic top the league, Glasgow rivals Rangers are bottom and are held up as an example of how things can go wrong on and off the pitch.


Apart from Celtic, only Ajax get ahead of Arsenal in the table based on a range of debt and financial performance indicators, but the North London side are ahead of Bayern Munich and Manchester United (ranked fourth). Not surprisingly, S&P Capital IQ suggest that Arsenal's financial stability may be related to its unwillingness to 'buy' success by spending heavily on transfers

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if this is good or bad really.....

>

> Celtic and Arsenal hold top positions in a new

> football financial strength league of 44 European

> clubs devised by S&P Capital IQ. While Celtic top

> the league, Glasgow rivals Rangers are bottom and

> are held up as an example of how things can go

> wrong on and off the pitch.

>

> Apart from Celtic, only Ajax get ahead of Arsenal

> in the table based on a range of debt and

> financial performance indicators, but the North

> London side are ahead of Bayern Munich and

> Manchester United (ranked fourth). Not

> surprisingly, S&P Capital IQ suggest that

> Arsenal's financial stability may be related to

> its unwillingness to 'buy' success by spending

> heavily on transfers



Imagine that, the Arsenal have a sustainable businesss model.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The only thing I've ever grudginly liked about

> him

> > was this statement he made a few years back.

> >

> > ?To be honest I never cared much for Manchester

> > United fans. For the most part they?re clueless

> > glory hunters, trying to add a sense of

> > accomplishment to their own pointless lives by

> > jumping on the bandwagon of a successful

> sporting

> > club, in many cases on the other side of the

> > world?

> >

> > That from a Yanited "legend"

>

> 0/10

> It's a well known fake quote...



Of course it is, he's still coming out with some pearlers about the rags, must have a book to sell, don't you think and doubtless that will be crammed with lies.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blimey, quietly scathing. Also rather undermine's

> Keane's point about AF criticising players in his

> book!!



RK left Utd because he criticised players, remember the MUTV rant? I don't think there's a Utd fan who doesn't think he's being hypocritical on this point. Quietly scathing, but nonetheless slagging someone off for being slagged off. Two wrongs and all that. Somehow I don't think RK will lose any sleep about comments from a journeyman footballer no one has heard off...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder how much the rebranding is costing in total?  Could the money be used in a better way ? 
    • It's not fair to hold Corbyn's brother's views against him when he has never explicitly or implicitly endorsed them. And he has enough of his own terrible positions to criticise anyway.
    • Completely unacceptable. They need to fund a proper, permanent park warden presence or this sort of behaviour will get worse. Parks should be safe for all to enjoy and being assaulted and threatened by teenage gangs may put more vulnerable people off using the park altogether. If they are prepared to threaten to hurt an animal then where might it lead? Sorry Alice but we'll have to disagree on this one. This does not sound like kids just being silly; lobbing water bombs at each other is one thing, but targeting complete strangers out for a walk and minding their own business and trying to kick their dog is, in my view, no laughing matter. A group of 15 teenagers can be intimidating, not to everyone but for some it can be, especially if their behaviour is aggressive.  
    • Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...