Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What Alan said and shouldn't you be rejoicing

> in

> > your victory rather than having a go at your

> > rivals?

>

>

>

> Not like the players are setting an example.

>

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-329504

> 05


I would suggest the media and other who should know better stop being so sanctimonious. Step up Spurs legend Gazza. "I don't understand Spurs fans fuss over Wishere's comments. He loves Arsenal , so is bound to hate Spurs. Spurs fans should be more worried about embarrassed by Arsenal every season". Is what he did as bad as the neo Nazis at CSKA Fulham during their day out in Paris, is it as offensive as the songs sung by certain sections of Liverpool support about the Munich air disaster or certain sections of the Yanited support about Hillsborough? There is a plethora of items for the esteemed members of the press and media to be morally outraged by and they choose this?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe you chose not to read all of my post all

> congratulating you and the Arsenal and Arsene

> Wenger in particular PD? I never mentioned

> Wilshire and I don't have a problem with what he

> did.


I did Jah and this wasn't aimed at you, but at Otta. I find the over the top reaction to Wilshere's bit of nonsense laughable, especially coming from the torygraph, and the fact that despite the lambasting the rag gets on here, someone chooses to use it to highlight a so called issue.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PD, I don't really care a jot about Wiltshire's

> chant, I was merely pointing out that a player

> doing it is only going to encourage others to do

> it.


Encourage them to do what exactly, join in a chant they've been singing for years? A chant that contains the word shit? And that upsets your sensibilities does it?

Oh FFS, no it doesn't upset my sensibilities. Jah said something about enjoying your victory rather than having a poke at your rivals, so I said well the players are having a dig at their rivals. That was it, I didn't criticise him, I didn't make a judgement, I merely pointed out that it had happened.


And you think I'm the sensitive one? Pot and kettle mate.

Kane will definitely stay at Spurs this summer. I think what happens at Real Madrid will decide a lot of the big transfer business this summer, who they buy and then subsequently sell, with Barca's transfer embargo they are top of the food chain at the moment. If De Gea signs for them hopefully we'll get someone decent like Benzema in return...

Barca's transfer embargo has come at a good time for them. It's not like they're short of quality. Are they alloweds to sell?


Benitez said he shouldn't comment too much about Sterling because he's another club's player, which is code for he'll soon be our player. With Rogers staying at the pool, Sterling looks certain to be off. A move somewhere like Real could be good for England (if he can get a game) and frankly I'd rather have a nice transfer fee than a player who doesn't want to play for his club. Just not sure I trust Rogers to spend said fee.

People here told me to let this drop many times, but it turns out that it's become part of FIFAs ability to buy the right end result. It also reflects badly on the FAI.


Fifa paid the Football Association of Ireland 5m euros (?3.6m) to stop legal action after France controversially beat Ireland in a World Cup play-off.

FAI chief executive John Delaney said he believed they had a case against Fifa after French striker Thierry Henry's handball in the 2009 match.

Delaney said a "legitimate agreement" was made to drop the claim after Ireland missed the 2010 World Cup.

The FAI first requested that they be allowed to be the 33rd team at that WC, which Blatter made a joke about. Delaney said in his meeting with Blatter that he used some choice swear words to let him know what he thought of him.


I doubt the FAI could have afforded a legal case and how could they seriously consider they might have won it? It's sport after all and shit happens. I'm not sure what the FAI should have done but up until recently Delaney was saying there was a confidential agreement in place with FIFA which he couldn't speak about. Yet now he does.


As the money wasn't going into someone's pocket, as far as we know,what should a poor Football Association have done when it was a case of take it or nothing? I'm not sure but I'd have liked the offer to have been made public at the time it was made and FIFA told to stuff it.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People here told me to let this drop many times,

> but it turns out that it's become part of FIFAs

> ability to buy the right end result. It also

> reflects badly on the FAI.

>

> Fifa paid the Football Association of Ireland 5m

> euros (?3.6m) to stop legal action after France

> controversially beat Ireland in a World Cup

> play-off.

> FAI chief executive John Delaney said he believed

> they had a case against Fifa after French striker

> Thierry Henry's handball in the 2009 match.

> Delaney said a "legitimate agreement" was made to

> drop the claim after Ireland missed the 2010 World

> Cup.


Yes you should let it drop. If I remember rightly one of Irelands opponents during the qualify rounds had a stone wall penalty turned down and they, as far as I'm aware, didn't make the same amount of fuss the Irish did. We all know FIFA are toxic to the core, but FAI haven't exactly covered themselves in glory by taking their money. It gives the impression they are more interested in the money than the integrity of the beautiful game.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People here told me to let this drop many times,

> but it turns out that it's become part of FIFAs

> ability to buy the right end result. It also

> reflects badly on the FAI.

>

> Fifa paid the Football Association of Ireland 5m

> euros (?3.6m) to stop legal action after France

> controversially beat Ireland in a World Cup

> play-off.

> FAI chief executive John Delaney said he believed

> they had a case against Fifa after French striker

> Thierry Henry's handball in the 2009 match.

> Delaney said a "legitimate agreement" was made to

> drop the claim after Ireland missed the 2010 World

> Cup.

Just in in case YOU hadn't noticed Declan, Handball incident clearly mentioned, so what are you claiming I've missed? I also make mention of the payment which is the new development, again what am I missing?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the only way to sort this is to ban loud fireworks for private sale (and preferably ban fireworks altogether except for public displays). I don't know whether that has implications I'm not aware of eg I have no idea how many people are involved in firework manufacture.
    • Very happy to recommend Tommy Rooney's excellent work again. He's been servicing my boiler for years now, but this time he swiftly fixed a leaky radiator valve. I put out a call on Friday and it was repaired - and improved - by Monday evening. I asked him if he had an opinion about my other radiators, and he reassured me as he pointed out the leaky bathroom rad was a non-standard length, which was why it caused problems. There followed a brief but detailed history of improvements in regulations for valves and fittings over the years, so that I could understand precisely what the issue was. How many plumbers will do that for you? "I've just got a memory for weird things," says Tommy modestly.
    • Wanted 2 x Adult and 1 x Children tickets for Dulwich fireworks tonight please!
    • Labour have changed a number of things overnight.   1. VAT on school fees - this has resulted in 25,000 moving until state education. 2. Increasing NICs adding billions to the cost of going to work. 3. Introducing the Employment Rights Bill causing employers to stop hiring. This and item 2 have added 100,000 people to the unemployment scrapheap. These are also causing businesses to relocate further harming the economy. 4. Scrapping all the small boats deterrents meaning 60,000 illegal migrants have arrived in small boats since they were elected. 5. Dishing out huge public sector payroses with no conditions so we have a massively increased payroll and doctors etc arestill going out on strike. 6.changed IHT and non domicile tax rules causing 16,500 millionaires to leave the UK and stop paying any tax here at all forever. 7. Alongside 6, leaving the budget up until an historically late period after the last budget has caused a house price crash, killing the market and decimating government stamp duty receipts. 8. Their profligate borrowing (£100bn extra in just one year) to fund all their lavish promises means the government can now only borrow at the highest ever yields on records. They are more beholden to the bond markets than Liz Truss was. 9. The rate of inflation has doubled under this government. It was a healthy 2% when they came in. For most of the last year, as a result of all of the above it is now nearly 4%.   These are all decisions the Labour government took that have immediate cause and effect.  Its no good harking back to 15 years ago. The current administration was gifted the fastest growing economy in the G7 and within 15 months they have destroyed it.    And things are only going to get worse this winter.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...