Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a more uplifting note Jimmy Greaves has reportedly left hospital.


He has entered a rehabilitation unit for the next few weeks. Still a long way to go but hearing he is improving daily for very good news indeed.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm a BT Broadband/Sport customer but are you

> saying I'm gonna have to fork out another fiver to

> watch it?



Yes, I think so, for Europe.


Anyway...just to cheer you up Jah (and me). I make old Bagpuss right


http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jun/11/harry-redknapp-tottenham-major-disappointment

I thought Harry was doing a good job at Spurs and only got sacked due to him thinking he was going to be England manager. There was something seriously wrong at QPR I reckon and maybe he bailed out as he knew what was going to happen. The lifespan of a manager is very short in England for the most part. The sacked one's can't all be bad surely though I'm not sure what Newcastle think they've got. I was speaking with a geordie yesterday and he was not pleased.

Alan Medic Wrote:


I was speaking with a geordie yesterday and he was not pleased.


***


That's part of the problem. They never are. They think they're a big club but they've won nothing since 1969 and before that you'd have to go back to the early 50s for a couple of FA Cup wins and that's about it.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They are a well supported club, bigger gates than

> most in the EPL. Doesn't that make them a big

> club? Aren't the fans entitled to expect better?



In the nadir of the mid-80s West Ham had bigger avergae gates than both 'giants' Chelsea and Newcastle. We've always had strong core support much more than those w*nkers at the Bridge but also the so called NE Giants (I'd add Sunderland into that too)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > They are a well supported club, bigger gates

> than

> > most in the EPL. Doesn't that make them a big

> > club? Aren't the fans entitled to expect

> better?

>

>

> In the nadir of the mid-80s West Ham had bigger

> avergae gates than both 'giants' Chelsea and

> Newcastle. We've always had strong core support

> much more than those w*nkers at the Bridge but

> also the so called NE Giants (I'd add Sunderland

> into that too)


If I remember rightly those w*nkers from the bridge attracted less than 10k on average back then.

Thought I'd check that and quite an interesting surprise it was too. In the 80's, all 3 of those clubs had their highest average attendence in a season when they were in the 2nd division. WH 27 in 1981, Chelsea 23 in 1980 and Newcastle almost 30 in 1984.


It just goes to show that people will watch teams who are winning. How Newcastle got to where they are now attendence wise without any success, is marketing genius or stupidity.

I think Newcastle did pretty well under Keegan at a time when football was having its (still ongoing) renaissance - Asprilla /Shearer era . That reignited (the undoubted massive one city club ) the passion and also supporting Newcatsle became very much a parat of the ?Geordie? nation identity. So, some reignited potential and some success (although no trophy) at the right time.

I think I'm going to support Wales for the next few years, don't expect them to win anything, but should be a fun ride. Whereas England will be more of the same.


Oh and I had to laugh this morning hen a West Ham supporting mate of mine updated his facebook status to simply say "Frank Lampard OBEse". No idea if he came up with it, but it made me laugh.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So it begins, various reports that Liverpool

> reject opening gambit of between ?25 and ?30

> million bid from City. The silly season has truly

> begun.



Reading on BBC Gossip column that United are bidding for Kane. Can't see that happening.


Also reading that City are considering a bid of around ?40m for Sterling. If there is any truth in that I hope Liverpool bite their hand off.

What will stop me going to football.


Playing music when the team scores - Tom Hark etc. Fortunately that is for the Championship.


Changing kits unecessarily (obviously because they want you to buy the second and third kit, and need the TV coverage).


WTF were Scotland wearing against Ireland? Perhaps they had popped into a ski shop selling retro stuff from the 80s. Made even some of Chelskis and Everton's kits look nice, even worse than Coventry's Chocolate brown kit, but Newcastle could give them a run for their money.

It wouldn't stop me going to football, but I could really do without those 'friendship' scarves for PL games...just wrong.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/12/31/article-2531574-1A54901D00000578-131_634x418.jpg



Oh, and those big flags too...stick 'em, sideways.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/12/31/article-2531574-1BE6B354000005DC-671_634x408.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...