Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HAPPY DAYS. Superb.

> >

> > And that Fat w*nker loses too.

> >

> > Careful what we wish for eh RD/AM/MM?

>

> Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.



So you're a believer now then?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ???? Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > HAPPY DAYS. Superb.

> > >

> > > And that Fat w*nker loses too.

> > >

> > > Careful what we wish for eh RD/AM/MM?

> >

> > Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.

>

>

> So you're a believer now then?


I'm a Monkee.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.



So... yes I know - this IS only Chelsea after all, and they're no Bournemouth, but it's a start. (gives me 3 points on predict-a-hammering too!) (smug smiley)

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for the

> last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> crosses into the box.

>

> Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)


The chaps on FF had it right - when Chelsea went a man down Bilic changed things to play wide - spread the play and stretch them - then put in crosses to a target man that were bound to pay off - it's almost football 101 when the opposition is a man down.


I said this when BFS was in charge; playing the ball into the big man is only a fault when its is the default setting for everything you do.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for the

> last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> crosses into the box.

>

> Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)



BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a straight swap aimed at not losing; billion brings on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an attempt to win the game. Says everything you need to know about BFS negative low ambition football. Fit for Bolton, maybe. I am sooooo fooking glad the fat w*nker has gone and given his comment since leaving I'm loving this rubbing his limited capabilities in his fat face. I hope Sunderland go down.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for

> the

> > last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> > crosses into the box.

> >

> > Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)

>

>

> BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a

> straight swap aimed at not losing; billion brings

> on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an

> attempt to win the game.


Bilic could afford to do that, Chelsea were down to 10 men...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > red devil Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll

> for

> > the

> > > last 20 minutes and the home side began

> pumping

> > > crosses into the box.

> > >

> > > Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)

> >

> >

> > BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a

> > straight swap aimed at not losing; billion

> brings

> > on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an

> > attempt to win the game.

>

> Bilic could afford to do that, Chelsea were down

> to 10 men...



er' yes NSS. But BFS wouldn't have, that's the point

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> er' yes NSS. But BFS wouldn't have, that's the

> point


Well Miss Marple, today he put on Defoe (an out and out striker) when Sunderland's Toivonen (midfielder) was injured, so in this instance, he clearly did...

Agree with a lot of what Paul Scholes said.

Just now LVG came out with this little gem...


We are improving a lot, but it is a process. We were in the last 16 of the Capital One Cup and in the Champions League. Last year it was not like this.


Hellefookinglujah, we made the last 16 of the League Cup*. Next year, the quarters!



*Puts up bunting....*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm fairly sure everyone engaged with this topic will have received this email yesterday, but just in case... "To whom it may concern, We are reaching out to invite you to our upcoming Residents & Stakeholder Drop In Sessions for Gala 2026. We are hosting two drop-in style sessions (one virtual, and one in person) to facilitate more in depth conversations, allowing us to run through our plans for 2026 and to discuss how we are going to address your feedback. We look forward to meeting you in person or online and discussing our event plans for both Gala and On The Rye Festival in more detail. Evening Session (IN PERSON): Time: 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM Date: Wednesday 11th February Location: Watson's General Telegraph Lunchtime Session (VIRTUAL MEETING): Time: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM Date: Friday 13th February We are offering 15 minute slots to speak directly with us in a virtual meeting. Please confirm your availability within this drop in period and we will confirm a time with you. You will then be sent a link directly to join the virtual session. If you would like to attend, please respond with: Your name: Your address: If you will be attending the virtual or in person meeting: Your availability for a meeting time online (if applicable): If you have any access needs so we can accommodate: We really appreciate your feedback and taking the time to attend our engagement meetings. Yours sincerely, Community Team | GALA Festival"
    • Many thanks to the woman who looked after our old deaf Miniature Schnauzer who got separated from us in the park this morning. And thank you to the man who alerted us . My husband is very relieved and grateful. If any one knows who these people are please say thank you as he didn't get their names. 
    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...