Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Otta

Otta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HAPPY DAYS. Superb.

> >

> > And that Fat w*nker loses too.

> >

> > Careful what we wish for eh RD/AM/MM?

>

> Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.



So you're a believer now then?

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ???? Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > HAPPY DAYS. Superb.

> > >

> > > And that Fat w*nker loses too.

> > >

> > > Careful what we wish for eh RD/AM/MM?

> >

> > Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.

>

>

> So you're a believer now then?


I'm a Monkee.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.



So... yes I know - this IS only Chelsea after all, and they're no Bournemouth, but it's a start. (gives me 3 points on predict-a-hammering too!) (smug smiley)

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for the

> last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> crosses into the box.

>

> Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)


The chaps on FF had it right - when Chelsea went a man down Bilic changed things to play wide - spread the play and stretch them - then put in crosses to a target man that were bound to pay off - it's almost football 101 when the opposition is a man down.


I said this when BFS was in charge; playing the ball into the big man is only a fault when its is the default setting for everything you do.

????

????

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for the

> last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> crosses into the box.

>

> Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)



BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a straight swap aimed at not losing; billion brings on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an attempt to win the game. Says everything you need to know about BFS negative low ambition football. Fit for Bolton, maybe. I am sooooo fooking glad the fat w*nker has gone and given his comment since leaving I'm loving this rubbing his limited capabilities in his fat face. I hope Sunderland go down.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for

> the

> > last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> > crosses into the box.

> >

> > Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)

>

>

> BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a

> straight swap aimed at not losing; billion brings

> on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an

> attempt to win the game.


Bilic could afford to do that, Chelsea were down to 10 men...

????

????

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > red devil Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll

> for

> > the

> > > last 20 minutes and the home side began

> pumping

> > > crosses into the box.

> > >

> > > Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)

> >

> >

> > BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a

> > straight swap aimed at not losing; billion

> brings

> > on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an

> > attempt to win the game.

>

> Bilic could afford to do that, Chelsea were down

> to 10 men...



er' yes NSS. But BFS wouldn't have, that's the point

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> er' yes NSS. But BFS wouldn't have, that's the

> point


Well Miss Marple, today he put on Defoe (an out and out striker) when Sunderland's Toivonen (midfielder) was injured, so in this instance, he clearly did...

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Agree with a lot of what Paul Scholes said.

Just now LVG came out with this little gem...


We are improving a lot, but it is a process. We were in the last 16 of the Capital One Cup and in the Champions League. Last year it was not like this.


Hellefookinglujah, we made the last 16 of the League Cup*. Next year, the quarters!



*Puts up bunting....*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • CPR Dave
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...