Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HAPPY DAYS. Superb.

> >

> > And that Fat w*nker loses too.

> >

> > Careful what we wish for eh RD/AM/MM?

>

> Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.



So you're a believer now then?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ???? Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > HAPPY DAYS. Superb.

> > >

> > > And that Fat w*nker loses too.

> > >

> > > Careful what we wish for eh RD/AM/MM?

> >

> > Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.

>

>

> So you're a believer now then?


I'm a Monkee.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Start doing it at home and I'll believe you.



So... yes I know - this IS only Chelsea after all, and they're no Bournemouth, but it's a start. (gives me 3 points on predict-a-hammering too!) (smug smiley)

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for the

> last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> crosses into the box.

>

> Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)


The chaps on FF had it right - when Chelsea went a man down Bilic changed things to play wide - spread the play and stretch them - then put in crosses to a target man that were bound to pay off - it's almost football 101 when the opposition is a man down.


I said this when BFS was in charge; playing the ball into the big man is only a fault when its is the default setting for everything you do.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for the

> last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> crosses into the box.

>

> Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)



BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a straight swap aimed at not losing; billion brings on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an attempt to win the game. Says everything you need to know about BFS negative low ambition football. Fit for Bolton, maybe. I am sooooo fooking glad the fat w*nker has gone and given his comment since leaving I'm loving this rubbing his limited capabilities in his fat face. I hope Sunderland go down.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll for

> the

> > last 20 minutes and the home side began pumping

> > crosses into the box.

> >

> > Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)

>

>

> BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a

> straight swap aimed at not losing; billion brings

> on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an

> attempt to win the game.


Bilic could afford to do that, Chelsea were down to 10 men...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > red devil Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Hammers boss Slaven Bilic threw on Carroll

> for

> > the

> > > last 20 minutes and the home side began

> pumping

> > > crosses into the box.

> > >

> > > Good to see the spirit of BFS lives on... :)

> >

> >

> > BFS would have bought on Caroll for Sakho in a

> > straight swap aimed at not losing; billion

> brings

> > on Carroll AND keeps Sakho on the pitch in an

> > attempt to win the game.

>

> Bilic could afford to do that, Chelsea were down

> to 10 men...



er' yes NSS. But BFS wouldn't have, that's the point

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> er' yes NSS. But BFS wouldn't have, that's the

> point


Well Miss Marple, today he put on Defoe (an out and out striker) when Sunderland's Toivonen (midfielder) was injured, so in this instance, he clearly did...

Agree with a lot of what Paul Scholes said.

Just now LVG came out with this little gem...


We are improving a lot, but it is a process. We were in the last 16 of the Capital One Cup and in the Champions League. Last year it was not like this.


Hellefookinglujah, we made the last 16 of the League Cup*. Next year, the quarters!



*Puts up bunting....*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
    • Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...