Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mourinho behaved like a brat when interviewed after the game. He chose not to answer any question which begs the question why he bothered to appear in front of the cameras. Trevor Francis in commentary declared he has lost the players. Michael Owen also in commentary said nothing of interest. Big result for Liverpool. Given Costa should have been sent off it wasn't worthy of a professional team to try and have Lucas sent off.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mourinho behaved like a brat when interviewed

> after the game. He chose not to answer any

> question which begs the question why he bothered

> to appear in front of the cameras. Trevor Francis

> in commentary declared he has lost the players.

> Michael Owen also in commentary said nothing of

> interest. Big result for Liverpool. Given Costa

> should have been sent off it wasn't worthy of a

> professional team to try and have Lucas sent off.


The measure of a manager is how they perform when things aren't going well. His recent antics speak volumes.

Eurosport.com .....


WHAT THIS MEANS FOR RANGERS - 'OLD' AND 'NEW'


Depending upon further appeals, in purely sporting terms, this decision means there must be a huge question mark placed over trophies the 'old' Rangers won while the EBT system was in place between 2001 and 2010 before the 'old' Glasgow club was liquidated in 2012. HMRC are claiming around ?46.2m of unpaid tax from Murray's time as owner. The term 'financial doping' has been used in relation to the use of EBTs. Scottish titles, Scottish Cups and Scottish League Cups were all won as well as qualification for the Champions League and UEFA Cup while avoiding paying tax on players' earnings.

If they strip them of those titles that would be disgusting. The players won them, and the players weren't fiddling the books.


And if I were a Celtic supporter I wouldn't want them, they'd be false titles. Bit like the guys that finished second to Lance Armstong. Bet they don't feel deep down that they actually won those tours.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If they strip them of those titles that would be

> disgusting. The players won them, and the players

> weren't fiddling the books.

>

> And if I were a Celtic supporter I wouldn't want

> them, they'd be false titles. Bit like the guys

> that finished second to Lance Armstong. Bet they

> don't feel deep down that they actually won those

> tours.


I don't think Celtic want the titles.


The players knew they were getting tax free money - that was promised to them in side letters on signing for the club - without that they wouldn't have come to Scotland, I'm sure. It was always amazing to Celtic fans how Rangers attracted the players they did, and its now clear.


I don't want them to lose the titles, couldn't care less really - but I do want them to lose the tax case, and for everyone to accept that it was wholly and knowingly wrong - everyone in tax knew it was wrong, its fraud.

I went to see Ireland lose to Scotland a year ago at Celtic Park and I'd have said they had no chance of qualifying based on their performance that night.


I was wrong and they have played very well since that night.


Many here (Otta?) said the O Neill Keane combo would end in tears but to be fair they have managed to get an limited pool of players to the final.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > . I'm so happy he's a Spurs

> > player.

>

>

> Until Levy cashes in next June.


That old clich? is getting a bit tiresome. Since Bale's gone we are no longer a selling club. We're building a strong young side with the emphasis on young home grown talent (several of whom were in last night's England squad) and it's good that we are finally backing our manager in his vision. I like what Pochettino is doing at Spurs and though we've drawn a few games too many we're still unbeaten since the opening day loss to Man Utd, a game we could and should have won.


The second of three London derbies on the spin coming up on Saturday. Should be quite tasty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had a great experience with Paul. He sorted out a lighting issue we had very efficiently and I would highly recommend him! https://www.checkatrade.com/trades/edgleycontracting382245
    • Week 11 fixtures...   Saturday 8th November Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United Everton v Fulham West Ham United v Burnley Sunderland v Arsenal Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Sunday 9th November Aston Villa v AFC Bournemouth Brentford v Newcastle United Crystal Palace v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v Leeds United Manchester City v Liverpool
    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...