Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The same Rangers that Mike Ashley is trying to up

> his stake in. Looking forward to that future SCSB?



That's the one.

And no, not at all.

He's in it for one thing and that's not the benefit of the football club.

I don't know if this is good or bad really.....


Celtic and Arsenal hold top positions in a new football financial strength league of 44 European clubs devised by S&P Capital IQ. While Celtic top the league, Glasgow rivals Rangers are bottom and are held up as an example of how things can go wrong on and off the pitch.


Apart from Celtic, only Ajax get ahead of Arsenal in the table based on a range of debt and financial performance indicators, but the North London side are ahead of Bayern Munich and Manchester United (ranked fourth). Not surprisingly, S&P Capital IQ suggest that Arsenal's financial stability may be related to its unwillingness to 'buy' success by spending heavily on transfers

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if this is good or bad really.....

>

> Celtic and Arsenal hold top positions in a new

> football financial strength league of 44 European

> clubs devised by S&P Capital IQ. While Celtic top

> the league, Glasgow rivals Rangers are bottom and

> are held up as an example of how things can go

> wrong on and off the pitch.

>

> Apart from Celtic, only Ajax get ahead of Arsenal

> in the table based on a range of debt and

> financial performance indicators, but the North

> London side are ahead of Bayern Munich and

> Manchester United (ranked fourth). Not

> surprisingly, S&P Capital IQ suggest that

> Arsenal's financial stability may be related to

> its unwillingness to 'buy' success by spending

> heavily on transfers



Imagine that, the Arsenal have a sustainable businesss model.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The only thing I've ever grudginly liked about

> him

> > was this statement he made a few years back.

> >

> > ?To be honest I never cared much for Manchester

> > United fans. For the most part they?re clueless

> > glory hunters, trying to add a sense of

> > accomplishment to their own pointless lives by

> > jumping on the bandwagon of a successful

> sporting

> > club, in many cases on the other side of the

> > world?

> >

> > That from a Yanited "legend"

>

> 0/10

> It's a well known fake quote...



Of course it is, he's still coming out with some pearlers about the rags, must have a book to sell, don't you think and doubtless that will be crammed with lies.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blimey, quietly scathing. Also rather undermine's

> Keane's point about AF criticising players in his

> book!!



RK left Utd because he criticised players, remember the MUTV rant? I don't think there's a Utd fan who doesn't think he's being hypocritical on this point. Quietly scathing, but nonetheless slagging someone off for being slagged off. Two wrongs and all that. Somehow I don't think RK will lose any sleep about comments from a journeyman footballer no one has heard off...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...