Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As the wraps start to come off the Dulwich Square hideously expensive works can anyone see what the difference is to how it was before other than:

New expensive looking crazy paving 

Restriction of emergency services access to Calton

Creation of a pedestrian vs cyclist choke point on the new cycle chicane at the entrance from Calton

It all all seems a lot of money spent for very little.

 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/352086-redesigned-dulwich-square/
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, malumbu said:

I'm looking forward to the opening.  But wonder why you have started a separate thread when you have been criticising it on other threads in the last three or four years.  People are already sitting out in the sun which is lovely 

Mal, surely you have much, much more important things to do than 'police' yet another thread. I thought you had advised that others should spend their energy on, according to you, more worthy pursuits, yet you keep popping up. 

Do you agree that the quality of the paving in and around 'Vanity Square', and also extending around the new and very expensive/exclusive residential development, is of a completely different quality to anything in East Dulwich nearby?

Edited by first mate

Except it is the closed Dulwich Village junction, hopefully to reopen at some point and not a square of any sort. 

Basic services are abandoned and not provided by the council, like pavements sweeping but lets waste more money on redesign of the junction

Edited by ab29
1 hour ago, alice said:

The story of that junction will be taught in universities.  The rise and fall of councils and inequalities. 

This is brilliant. 10/10, no notes. 👏👏👏

It's like whoever it was that was making out they basically lived in North Korea because they didn't get their way on whether a road should be closed or not. 

  • Haha 1
46 minutes ago, malumbu said:

I'd petition for closing more roads and doing similar eg by Goodrich school 

And would you, Mal, be openly doing this (petitioning for closing more roads) where you live, or just in Dulwich and ED, where I believe you don't.  Have you, indeed, petitioned for closure of roads around your home, and if so, which? Just how happy are your neighbours with your position on this?

2 hours ago, malumbu said:

Just questioned, not policed or reported.  We've had two more anti LTN threads in the last day.  The square looks like it will be lovely.  I'd petition for closing more roads and doing similar eg by Goodrich school 

I'm sure you will. But you do a lot of thread 'policing' because you seem constantly to be trying to shutdown any questioning or discussion around the value of our local LTNs. This despite not even living here!

Although you don't live here  you also seem to be on some sort of mission to tell us we should all move on and spend our time on more worthy things, as defined by you.

1 hour ago, Penguin68 said:

And would you, Mal, be openly doing this (petitioning for closing more roads) where you live, or just in Dulwich and ED, where I believe you don't.  Have you, indeed, petitioned for closure of roads around your home, and if so, which? Just how happy are your neighbours with your position on this?

Remember, LCC encourages its members to get involved in street closures all over London, so not living in the area is, in their eyes, no bar to participation in consultations, lobbying activities, social media activism etc...

Edited by first mate
  • Like 1
6 hours ago, malumbu said:

I'm looking forward to the opening.  But wonder why you have started a separate thread when you have been criticising it on other threads in the last three or four years.  People are already sitting out in the sun which is lovely 

Err Malumbu, because it is close to opening and there wasn't another thread that fitted my question and are you here to police what people do or don't post. Look, if people are interested in the subject then the thread will live, if not then it will die - that's how forums work!

 

I am sure a few people are looking forward to the opening but to me it seems like a huge waste of money that, other than the points I raised earlier, seems to have done nothing to  improve the junction. Can anyone tell me what the huge spend has actually changed?

It seems to me that in their desperate attempt to finally (and quickly) close part of the junction to emergency vehicles the council has spent a huge amount of money - I have never seen paving like that anywhere else in Dulwich and it looks like it cost a fortune - at a time when the council is pleading poverty it is a bit hypocritical

  • Like 1

But Earl, ignoring another one of your false accusations, do you have any input on whether you think it does anything other than:

  • Add new expensive looking crazy paving 
  • Restriction of emergency services access to Calton
  • Creation of a pedestrian vs cyclist choke point on the new cycle chicane at the entrance from Calton
45 minutes ago, Rockets said:

But Earl, ignoring another one of your false accusations, do you have any input on whether you think it does anything other than:

  • Add new expensive looking crazy paving 
  • Restriction of emergency services access to Calton
  • Creation of a pedestrian vs cyclist choke point on the new cycle chicane at the entrance from Calton

In further Partridgisms from Rocks, i'm tickled that according to google no one has ever written the phrase "expensive looking crazy paving" on the internet before. Its a rare almost googlewhack 

  • Haha 2
13 minutes ago, Azalea said:

Can someone post a picture?

Here on the Southwark website. Looks quite nice. 

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/improving-our-streets/live-projects/street-improvements/dulwich-streets-for-people
 

 

56 minutes ago, Rockets said:
  • Restriction of emergency services access to Calton
  • Creation of a pedestrian vs cyclist choke point on the new cycle chicane at the entrance from Calton

Emergency vehicles are allowed on cycle lanes so not a problem. There is a slight bend in the cycle path but it is not too severe. 

Edited by Hen123
53 minutes ago, snowy said:

In further Partridgisms from Rocks, i'm tickled that according to google no one has ever written the phrase "expensive looking crazy paving" on the internet before. Its a rare almost googlewhack 

Sorry let me correct it for you expensive looking "natural stone paving" as the council refers to it - has anyone seen something as extravagant anywhere else in Dulwich?

 

53 minutes ago, march46 said:

The entrance from Calton hasn’t been built yet Rockets so hold your horses before criticising that they’ve created any problem. 

The kerb stones are in though aren't they? The track and the new chicane is clear to see.

 

You know what, looking at that council schematic I can't help but wonder why they didn't just divert bikes around Gilkes Place and Gilkes Crescent and avoid the whole trying to mix bikes and pedestrians in a pedestrian area.

52 minutes ago, Hen123 said:

Emergency vehicles are allowed on cycle lanes so not a problem. There is a slight bend in the cycle path but it is not too severe. 

An emergency vehicle will not fit along the path currently created heading up Calton unless it mounts the new pavement  - I might be wrong but I thought the council had said that all emergency vehicles would have to go up Court Lane and cannot use Calton anymore?

Edited by Rockets

The new square looks fantastic! 
 

Will encourage so many more to walk and cycle and visit the local businesses. I would never have done so before as the pollution and congestion was just miserable: I already find we are spending more in the local shops and enjoying the local community more as a result.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...