Jump to content

Best mobile network for ED (and elsewhere) - streaming not calls


Recommended Posts

About to buy a new mobile to checking on networks. My wife wants me to change to T mobile....


"3" has been great for me for years but anytime I go outside London on short breaks etc its pretty rubbish, but its good in ED.


I'm not so concerned about calls as mostly i text - but streaming Netflix on way to work etc. for example.


I'd like to get better coverage when on hols in the UK (incl Nortnern Ireland etc) but don't want to move to a network that doesn't work in ED.


Which network has the best balance?

didn't t-mobile always piggy back off orange?

EE is deutsche telekom and france telecom buying t-mobile and orange (and what with O2 being spanish, soon womanofdulwiuch is going to struggle to sign up to anyone!!), they've certainly the resources ot invest in the infrastruture as we head to 4g.


I've recently swtiched from O2 to vodafone and am pretty unimpressed with data on both. I don't know if this is less to do with specific providers and more that 3g is creaking under the amount of data usage following the smart phone revolution.


Just make sure your new mobile is 4g compatible I reckon.

Networks and signals in most of London are deteriorating generally as they're not keeping up with demand. The voice quality and strengths I was getting even 4-5 years ago are nowhere near that now. There are a few technical reasons for this (I'll spare you).


I'm on the new EE 4G and the reality is that I only get a 4G signal in certain parts of central london and one spot in Camberwell. So coverage is not there yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...