Jump to content

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, malumbu said:

I'm not, but just making the point that driving on a blue badge is not the only way those who have walking issues can maintain their mobility.  As March points out there are adapted bikes and wheels for wellbeing dova wonderful job in giving an experience of the different options.  And mobility scooters.  I have no idea which is the most suitable option for an individual.  Maybe more than one.  

Ah, there you go again, telling disabled people how they can travel without listening to their needs. 

You should be consulting with people with mobility needs, including the many different types of disability, age related conditions and other infirmities. 

Tell you what, I lend you one of my wheelchairs for a week and you lend me your legs then we can see how you find it in someone else's shoes. That way you might have a better idea of the daily challenges you assume to know all about... 

Edited by Spartacus
  • Agree 3
18 hours ago, Spartacus said:

Ah, there you go again, telling disabled people how they can travel without listening to their needs. 

You should be consulting with people with mobility needs, including the many different types of disability, age related conditions and other infirmities. 

 

Suggest you Ab and FM actually read what I said rather than automatically jump to the wrong conclusion.  At no point did I infer that I knew better or was telling others what to do. That would be silly.  

  • Agree 1

I think Spartacus did read what you said and reacted to it. Perhaps part of the issue lies with you as an able-bodied cycling activist feeling the need to emphasise cycling as an option to those who require blue badges and have poor mobility and probably have a good grasp of what their needs and options are, already.

  • Thanks 1

I did witness by far the best example of strange cycling behaviour at the weekend at Dulwich Square.

A woman was cycling down Calton with sprogs following her on bikes and as she approached the area before the shops she let out a blood curdling scream to alert a group of pedestrians crossing at the bit that clearly should actually be a pedestrian crossing of her imminent entrance to the chicane. There was zero chance of any collision and the looks the group of pedestrians gave to this lady were hilarious and suitably dismissive - I watched said lady and her cycling offspring and I turned to my wife and said...."Is she, is she, is she, is she going to stop at the red light......No, I knew it!"  Of course she didn't and luckily for the pedestrians crossing under the green light for pedestrians they stopped in time and she didn't feel a blood-curdling scream was necessary.

  • 1 month later...

Do you not think it is going to cause some challenges given the building works are taking place in the garden of the property and I presume access for the works will be through the back gate that is adjacent to the Calton Ave entrance to Dulwich Square which will probably lead to builders vans and unloading vehicles being parked nearby?

  • Haha 1
21 hours ago, Rockets said:

Are any of the Dulwich Square supporters concerned that the plans for a two-bedroom dwelling (in I presume the garden of) at 1B Court Lane might lead to significant disruption during the building works?

I expect that most of us go with the flow.  Polarising things plays straight into the hands of Reform.  I expect that is something you don't want.

Malumbu......err sorry - it was a legitimate question. You use the Square don't you - surely there will be disruption - the entrance to the building works will be beyond the threshold of the road narrowing and very close to the cycle parking?

Not sure how you have managed to take that and link it to Reform - I can't imagine even they would run on a ticket based on the outrage caused by the building of an additional house in the garden of a house adjacent to Dulwich Square 😉 

Apparently the application was rejected once and some of the neighbours are not at all happy about it.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Rockets said:

Malumbu......err sorry - it was a legitimate question. You use the Square don't you - surely there will be disruption - the entrance to the building works will be beyond the threshold of the road narrowing and very close to the cycle parking?

Not sure how you have managed to take that and link it to Reform - I can't imagine even they would run on a ticket based on the outrage caused by the building of an additional house in the garden of a house adjacent to Dulwich Square 😉 

Apparently the application was rejected once and some of the neighbours are not at all happy about it.

I often wonder if malumbu is an actual human being or a bot.

Say you are killed by a cyclist - by a default, according to malumbu thingy you are reform voter - even if you are dead - so apparently it is ok

Edited by ab29
  • Agree 2
Guest
6 hours ago, Rockets said:

Do you not think it is going to cause some challenges given the building works are taking place in the garden of the property and I presume access for the works will be through the back gate that is adjacent to the Calton Ave entrance to Dulwich Square which will probably lead to builders vans and unloading vehicles being parked nearby?

I thought access would be through the garage doors on Calton Ave.  Presumably Southwark Council will suspend the cycle lane at DV Junction if the planning is agreed.  If the "long term resident" cannot live in the original house, perhaps they should move!

On 07/05/2025 at 17:06, Rockets said:

Are any of the Dulwich Square supporters concerned that the plans for a two-bedroom dwelling (in I presume the garden of) at 1B Court Lane might lead to significant disruption during the building works?

I think it's just you

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the only way to sort this is to ban loud fireworks for private sale (and preferably ban fireworks altogether except for public displays). I don't know whether that has implications I'm not aware of eg I have no idea how many people are involved in firework manufacture.
    • Very happy to recommend Tommy Rooney's excellent work again. He's been servicing my boiler for years now, but this time he swiftly fixed a leaky radiator valve. I put out a call on Friday and it was repaired - and improved - by Monday evening. I asked him if he had an opinion about my other radiators, and he reassured me as he pointed out the leaky bathroom rad was a non-standard length, which was why it caused problems. There followed a brief but detailed history of improvements in regulations for valves and fittings over the years, so that I could understand precisely what the issue was. How many plumbers will do that for you? "I've just got a memory for weird things," says Tommy modestly.
    • Wanted 2 x Adult and 1 x Children tickets for Dulwich fireworks tonight please!
    • Labour have changed a number of things overnight.   1. VAT on school fees - this has resulted in 25,000 moving until state education. 2. Increasing NICs adding billions to the cost of going to work. 3. Introducing the Employment Rights Bill causing employers to stop hiring. This and item 2 have added 100,000 people to the unemployment scrapheap. These are also causing businesses to relocate further harming the economy. 4. Scrapping all the small boats deterrents meaning 60,000 illegal migrants have arrived in small boats since they were elected. 5. Dishing out huge public sector payroses with no conditions so we have a massively increased payroll and doctors etc arestill going out on strike. 6.changed IHT and non domicile tax rules causing 16,500 millionaires to leave the UK and stop paying any tax here at all forever. 7. Alongside 6, leaving the budget up until an historically late period after the last budget has caused a house price crash, killing the market and decimating government stamp duty receipts. 8. Their profligate borrowing (£100bn extra in just one year) to fund all their lavish promises means the government can now only borrow at the highest ever yields on records. They are more beholden to the bond markets than Liz Truss was. 9. The rate of inflation has doubled under this government. It was a healthy 2% when they came in. For most of the last year, as a result of all of the above it is now nearly 4%.   These are all decisions the Labour government took that have immediate cause and effect.  Its no good harking back to 15 years ago. The current administration was gifted the fastest growing economy in the G7 and within 15 months they have destroyed it.    And things are only going to get worse this winter.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...