Jump to content

Warning - Lesson Learned, dodgy building site manager


AngelD

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, this is my first posting which I thought I'd might make others aware.


My mum recently had a new roof on her house which I must say was done really well by the roofers, they completed everything. Our issue is with the man who they worked for who has disappeared of the face of the earth with some of our money. She has no paperwork and the contact numbers he left useless. I'm trying to track him down at some of the locations that he said he is responsible for, but no joy. He conveniently took the business flyer that he left with her away (apparently he wanted to leave it with one of her neighbours)so who knows where he originated from! He we had been abit smarter we would have cottoned on sooner but alot of it happened quick and he is a pretty smoove talker too.


So if anyone knows of any elderly neighbours in Peckham/Nunhead/Dulwich/Forest Hill who is currently having any roofing, guttering or building work done, keep an eye out for a site manager called Charlie. He comes across as very caring and having their best interests at heart. I was conned into giving him money as a deposit because he said company policy can't deal with pensioners directly (yep he caught me at during a pretty rough heavy week!). He even bought his little daughter to my mums one day. He may also get you to speak to someone called Alan Tattfield who is supposed to be one of the directors of the company.


Sorry this post is alittle vague and long, but thought it might pre-warn anyone who may come across him in the area in the future.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...