More threads!

[Earl Aelfheah]

Several people vocal in their opposition to the Dulwich LTN have been arguing that we should have multiple threads on the topic. So here you go! You’re welcome

Edited January 20 by Earl Aelfheah

[first mate]

Earl you are hilarious, your sheer wit and invention are wrong-footing us all. 

 

[Earl Aelfheah]

I mean I could say ‘so what?’ As others have so eloquently responded. Either it is OK to create multiple posts or it’s not. I don’t think it is, but who am I to swim against the tide?

[first mate]

My guess is posters might think you have set up an online clothing emporium of some sort. 

I do like your new portrait by the way, it is alarmingly similar to how I have pictured you, in the past.

[ab29]

Someone is having a tantrum 🙂

[Earl Aelfheah]

@ab29 

and? Why does it bother you?

We can create as many threads as we like - it's a free country after all 😗

To quote someone else 🤣😆

Edited January 20 by Earl Aelfheah

[ab29]

But of course 🙂

[Rockets]

24 minutes ago, ab29 said:

Someone is having a tantrum 🙂

Clearly - time for an @administrator yellow card perhaps? Earl is clearly abusing the right to use the forum and is trying to ruin it for everyone else. All gone a bit too Mr Chicken for my liking.

[ab29]

why do I think it is one and the same person? 😉

[Earl Aelfheah]

1 hour ago, Rockets said:

Clearly - time for an @administrator yellow card perhaps? Earl is clearly abusing the right to use the forum and is trying to ruin it for everyone else. All gone a bit too Mr Chicken for my liking.

Oh interesting. So you don’t approve of multiple threads? What happened to “We can create as many threads as we like - it's a free country after all” 

Think you’ve kind of proven my point

Edited January 20 by Earl Aelfheah

[Rockets]

You're clearly abusing the forum and treating it, and the people who post here, with contempt.

[Earl Aelfheah]

I’m sorry? People have literally said that to even suggest it’s not cool to create multiple threads is censorship. You have created multiple threads on the LTN, and defended it. 

Edited January 20 by Earl Aelfheah

[first mate]

I think Earl you miss the point, your constant deflection, obfuscation, nitpicking, messing with forum etiquette,  are ways to detract and sabotage, we all know that but repeatedly trying to rubbish points made by others, by almost any means you can dream up, in the hope they will eventually give up, is akin to censorship. Admit it Earl, you want to close down all objection to LTNs, CPZs, Dulwich Square and anything that threatens your views on those subjects. You seem absolutely desperate in your attempts to do this, even going so low as to accuse me of lying and making stuff up.

It all began to make sense when Rockets revealed your shirty post to James Barber about how local speed humps were spoiling your driving experience, many years ago. I guess you must have experienced something akin to a religious conversion around cycling and like many converts you now feel it necessary to cajole others to join up. 

[Earl Aelfheah]

What has rockets ‘revealed’ or ‘uncovered’ exactly? Is this some weird, desperate, stalky behaviour again?

Honestly, talk deflection?

Ether you think it’s ok to have multiple threads or you don’t. In case you missed it, I’m the one arguing for some etiquette and illustrating my point with a mildly silly post. I think we can see who is throwing a tantrum (“you’re abusing the forum… treating people with contempt”). So calm down I’m just having a bit of a laugh. It wasn’t me inviting and defending multiple threads 🤣

Edited January 20 by Earl Aelfheah