Jump to content

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Rockets said:

What work are they doing outside ED station? Another route in and out of Dulwich disrupted...it's becoming a badly organised joke.

No idea, but whatever it was was backing up the traffic right up Lordship Lane.

There were four way (it said) lights before the roadworks, and a whole lane of the road dug up (on the station side).

On 27/03/2025 at 13:06, Earl Aelfheah said:

I'm not sure, but think it might be. Looked like there were pipes going in.

Walked past yesterday, it's not Thames Water, but Conway on behalf of Southwark Council. 

Don't know why they couldn't have done it alongside the night time resurfacing of that stretch a couple of weeks back.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Ah so it's part of the Melbourne Grove Streets for People works then. Madness that the council goes ahead with this when there are so many other works disrupting traffic in the area but I suspect year end budget surplus spends are at play here. Who at the council is responsible for the co-ordination of this type of thing?

  • 1 month later...

Overnight works / road surfacing that should have happened last night, and tonight, have apparently been postponed for a month. No letters. No follow ups. Just word of mouth amongst businesses opposite the junction 🫣😶😩 apparently due to TW leak that has sprung up - not that I can see where, but the local rumour mill is rumouring. 

Glad so much progress can now be seen, but it’s gonna take longer to complete than the originally planned: “13 weeks from 3 March” 😶‍🌫️. Does anyone have any confirmed / solid progress updates? 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Saw this article in the Guardian about pensioners in Italy who help advise on construction work, and it made me smile with the interest in road works in the area.  Not that this interest is limited to pensioners I add.  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/24/you-feel-useful-to-society-italy-umarell-busybody-pensioners-go-professional

1 hour ago, jazzer said:

OH FFS, please don't quote from that rag

".....Try talking and getting on with neighbours, it makes life so much easier helping each other out, chatting, talking, laughing, crying and having fun together. "🤔 

I'm confused 😕 

On 07/05/2025 at 19:33, LadyLordship said:

Overnight works / road surfacing that should have happened last night, and tonight, have apparently been postponed for a month. No letters. No follow ups. Just word of mouth amongst businesses opposite the junction 🫣😶😩 apparently due to TW leak that has sprung up - not that I can see where, but the local rumour mill is rumouring. 

Glad so much progress can now be seen, but it’s gonna take longer to complete than the originally planned: “13 weeks from 3 March” 😶‍🌫️. Does anyone have any confirmed / solid progress updates? 

 

 

How can this work be taking longer than 13 weeks? Does Southwark council have too much money and doesn't know how to spend it?

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, ab29 said:

Does Southwark council have too much money and doesn't know how to spend it?

Actually so long as no work is being done, and mostly it isn't being done, the only cost is to business and the general public is extending the costs of disruption. And it's mainly TFL who are bearing what build costs there are, I believe. And why should anyone in administration of public works care about the cost to the economy of extended public works? No skin off their wallets. Southwark certainly doesn't care about disruption to the general public and businesses, they still get their taxes paid. 

Edited by Penguin68
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
On 31/05/2025 at 12:05, Rockets said:

but there is always a delay for the new traffic signals

These are the things that could have been entirely planned for well before any work started. The wiring, the sequencing, the timing could have been fully designed beforehand. It needs to be tested in situ, certainly, but it should be able to plan the installation for as soon as the infrastructure is in place. It's as if Microsoft built a computer and then decided to design and implement an operating system to work on it. The whole thing about what will be a complex crossing surely would be designed first (when do cars and when do pedestrians move). Which is what the signals are about. 

Edited by Penguin68
  • 3 weeks later...

So the works supposed to end on 8th of June and of course it has not happened. There is now a new hole dug out by power network  - would be boring if it's thames water all the time - next to a church where the turn to College Rd is.

And to add to the misery in the area, Dartmouth Rd will be closed from 30th of June. Till 17th of July. Not thst snyone believes in the end date.

IMG_9436.jpeg

IMG_9427.jpeg

It may be that the power network work is part of the junction build, in which case the appallingly poor planning and allocation of work is even worse than I'd feared, or it may just be coincidental. All that appears to be holding the full opening up of the junction is the new traffic lights to be made operational, which should have been the first thing planned. If these works were being undertaken by a commercial company it would be bust by now. As, probably, are TFL and the council, but they can just go back to the money tree. (Wait for the council's cheerleaders to weigh in now...) 

  • 1 month later...

When I started this thread in February the works were scheduled to last, quite ridiculously, to mid June, it is now the end of July and they are still not complete, even though there has been no work at all for weeks apart from some overnight tarmacing and line painting on the 25th July. The 'emergency' lights are still working, the replacement lights still covered and the safety light work to improve pedestrian crossing still not switched on. What a complete shower those responsible, and I use that word quite wrongly, are. Actually the junction seems to be working, broadly, OK, so why the hell can't they finish it? Until they do it's still a hazard. 

If I remember correctly, the responsibility for the traffic lights may rest with TFL. The long standing debate over the last 10 plus years re this junction, was that TFL had refused both Southwark Councillors and MPs request to add a pedestrian phase to the lights. I also vaguely remember many years ago, the newly installed lights at CP Rd and  ED Road were delayed by TFL for weeks. They were there but not switched on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They clearly don’t.  I would expect better from the council.  Rather dismally, it sounds like any complaints or requests just fall on deaf ears.
    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
    • We used these guys for our underfloor heating, their heating engineer Sam was excellent. Very reassuring and sorted it all out properly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...