Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, jazzer said:

Exactly, the cycle lane was an excuse to slow traffic, it's unnecessary because it's never used, never seen one cyclist cycle along there, EVER, EVER. It is an excuse to solve another problem.  

It's meant to slow the traffic.  Narrows the road, so naturally slows the traffic.  That is because before it was a race track up to the cameras.  Much nicer now.

Yeo, it slows journey times, its a road designed to move traffic along it at 30mph, reduced by a clown to 20mph, creating greater levels of pollution as a result. And don't argue ulez or cpz or ltn's all designed to purely make money schemes. Why have road tax then???????????

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

The road is often gridlocked due to cars now being able to park thus reducing the whole road to one lane for both directions buses are often getting stuck - and if a cyclist happens to use the cycle lane the council throws a party for them when they reach the other end....such is the rarity of such an event. That whole road is now a festering relic to the whole botched active travel experiment- the very best visual reminder of the ludicrous approach taken by our council as they waste tax payers money to satiate the demands of the cycle lobby.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1

I see that Southwark cyclists website says cycling in the borough is lower than average, which is an interesting admission, given the amounts being spent on infrastructure.

March, you are right, I am reposting this elsewhere.

Edited by first mate
10 hours ago, Rockets said:

The road is often gridlocked due to cars now being able to park thus reducing the whole road to one lane for both directions buses are often getting stuck - and if a cyclist happens to use the cycle lane the council throws a party for them when they reach the other end....such is the rarity of such an event. That whole road is now a festering relic to the whole botched active travel experiment- the very best visual reminder of the ludicrous approach taken by our council as they waste tax payers money to satiate the demands of the cycle lobby.

Have you even read the traffic management order for it? Clearly not.

What were you banned for?

  • Agree 1

I got suspended for calling someone out for using the death of an engineer as a personal jibe. I should of learnt a lesson from some sage advice a rugby coach once gave me - it's not the player who throws the first punch that gets yellow-carded it's the player who retaliates. I think admin deemed me repeating my accusation against said poster for using the death of someone as a personal jibe as too much - fair enough - admin sets the rules....I did plead my innocence but got no response so I served my time (for a crime I didn't commit!!! ;-))

Snowy, yup you're right - invariably the person who retaliates get punished not the person who threw the first punch! Lessons learned and all that - and certainly I will be stickler for obeying the rules to the letter now - also acutely aware that there are probably some who will go out of their way to try to get people banned to silence dissenting voices in the debate!!

Probably good advice to everyone else to follow the rules for fear suspensions etc get issued to them.

45 minutes ago, Penguin68 said:

Mal, you do seem desparate to trivialise what are clearly disruptive and poorly planned and managed roadworks, implemented with no thought or care for the road users and tax payers. 

Yeah, would want to know which part of Dulwich this individual lives in - or even if it is a real person 🤔

Edited by ab29
1 hour ago, Penguin68 said:

Mal, you do seem desparate to trivialise what are clearly disruptive and poorly planned and managed roadworks, implemented with no thought or care for the road users and tax payers. 

Passed there today on the bus.

There were people working on them, and no apparent disruption to traffic.

The road being dug up outside ED station seemed to be causing much worse problems when I passed on Monday.

12 hours ago, Rockets said:

What work are they doing outside ED station? Another route in and out of Dulwich disrupted...it's becoming a badly organised joke.

It's very annoying as they actually did a good job of working on resurfacing the road there over a series of nights to minimise disruption, only to finish and then start digging up another bit during the day. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
    • Adapted not forced.  As have numerous species around the world.  Sort of thing that Attenborough features.  Domestic dogs another good example - hung around communities for food and then we become the leader of the pack.  Not sure how long it will take foxes to domesticate, but some will be well on their way.    Raccoons also on the way https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1j8j48e5z2o
    • My memory, admittedly not very reliable these days, places the shop on the block on the left hand side just before Burgess Park going towards Camberwell. Have also found a reference to Franklins Antiques being located at 157 Camberwell Road which is on that block. This is a screen shot obtained from Google maps of that address which accords with my memory except the entrance door was on the right hand side, where the grey door is, rather than in the centre.
    • The MFI was probably where Iceland is now. This post makes me feel very old - went to a 30th birthday party in the garden at the back. Oh to be 30 again! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...