Jump to content

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, EDResident2018 said:

Pedestrian crossing being put in, along with various utilities (broadband etc) upgrades

I think it was rather that the works were destroying the existing under pavement installations which were then needing reinstatement. As this work doesn't seem to be described in the letter I received showing scheduling it wouldn't surprise me if the work was also a surprise to the utilities with under pavement infrastructure who are now rushing to recover the situation. 

Broadband fibre is easily run (or blown) from 'manhole' flexibility points and doesn't need additional works to allow that. I'm guessing existing copper is being recovered to create more space. So I don't think this is clever planning rather more than TFL works screwing up other utilities who are having to install e.g. new cable chambers because their existing ones have been compromised by the works. 

Edited by Penguin68
1 hour ago, alice said:

M start a thread for positive vibes only see how that goes

I think you'll find that there have been many threads on here with positive vibes!

But it seems that it's the negative ones which stay in people's memories.

Also, it's a bit like online reviews such as TrustPilot.

 People tend to post if they have had a bad experience with a company or product. A good experience, not so much.

Same with starting a thread on here, I guess.

  • Agree 2
3 hours ago, Sue said:

I think you'll find that there have been many threads on here with positive vibes!

But it seems that it's the negative ones which stay in people's memories.

Also, it's a bit like online reviews such as TrustPilot.

 People tend to post if they have had a bad experience with a company or product. A good experience, not so much.

Same with starting a thread on here, I guess.

The posts on this part of the forum are virtually all complaining Sue.  Some people wake up in the morning angry.  Fortunately some of us don't.

Looking at the world there is of course plenty to be angry about.  We can discuss this on the Lounge.

 

5 hours ago, alice said:

M start a thread for positive vibes only see how that goes

I try from time to time but they tend to be hijacked or gather zero interest.   There are a small number of you who I expect have never posted anything positive.  Shame.

Edited by malumbu
On 03/04/2025 at 17:18, malumbu said:

The posts on this part of the forum are virtually all complaining Sue.  Some people wake up in the morning angry.  Fortunately some of us don't.

Looking at the world there is of course plenty to be angry about.  We can discuss this on the Lounge.

 

I try from time to time but they tend to be hijacked or gather zero interest.   There are a small number of you who I expect have never posted anything positive.  Shame.

I was talking about the forum as a whole.

Sorry, I didn't realise that you meant just this part of it!

On 01/04/2025 at 12:21, DulwichParker said:

As I'm sure you've seen, there are some massive roadworks going on outside the Grove Tavern site. Does anyone have any details on what they are? Are they related to any potential refurb of the Grove Tavern site?

I live in the area, contacted southwark council and tfl, have not received a response yet why the works are to take 13 weeks. 

How about working long hours / weekends / overnight? 

To minimise the chaos and disruption.

Edited by ab29

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...