Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He/she followed me and my friends quite a long way along the road so we worried they might be out of their catchment area. Quite dusty paws which also made me think perhaps they’d been roaming away from home for a few days.

Took photos in case anyone is missing them! Very pretty, friendly long-haired black and white cat, leopard print collar, pink paw-print metal tag. They eventually stopped following us across the road from Mrs Robinson.

IMG_1151.jpeg

IMG_1146.jpeg

IMG_1149.jpeg

IMG_1153.jpeg

Ah, grand! Yeah he was lurking near the vet when he first decided to promenade along Lordship Lane with us.  A friendly chap though he took gentle umbrage at me removing some of the leaves from his fur.

Raymond!! What a treasure. Long may he maraud.

  • Like 2
10 minutes ago, teddyboy23 said:

Don't know if Raymondo still does it.but he used to wander in and out the co op.which was last year😊 this cat knows how to chill.

Did he shoplift snack food like seagulls sometimes do, or did he queue up and pay like a responsible southeast London citizen?

21 hours ago, Sue said:

🤣 at the puns.

Seriously though, thank you for not assuming he must be lost just because he followed you a long way.

Thank you for posting on here rather than  taking him back to your house!

Of course! Not least because I live in Sydenham, so that would be a long way to take him out of his manor, he'd have been very confused. He looked pretty happy, I just thought it made sense to check.

18 hours ago, se22 said:

He seems purr-fectly happy pussyfooting around Lodship lane. 

I got a bit nervous when he decided to cross the road, but he must have thought it was a whisk(er) worth taking.

But it's not for me to paw-lice his movements.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...