Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 21/05/2025 at 23:52, Local Dulwich said:

Any views about this trend that appears to be happening more often!

Has recently happened to us and we had to accept a considerable reduction in agreed price for our property  (that was already well below asking price)

 

 

It's a case of who blinks first.  But  purchasers who do this will lose all good will form the owner and will probably suffer life changing accident as the Gods won't be smiling on them.

Edited by malumbu
Hypos sorry predictively tact

Should Estates agents also take some responsibility for this. 

In our case it feels like they have been acting on behalf of the buyer not the seller even though we are paying then for their service. 

Just to be clear I have reassured the buyer whose house we are buying off that we still pay them what we promised.

When this is all over should I states which Estate agent is involved?? 

  • Agree 2

It's my understanding that estate agents are obliged to put forward any offer to the seller made to them by the buyer. The decision to accept us up to the seller. 

If you're in a chain and someone in the chain has the brass neck to threaten to pull out at the last minute unless you take their lower offer, you're in a very tricky position and the gazunderer knows that.  It's a really nasty thing to do but a crappy person will do it to save money. 

That's why if you can be at the top of a chain by going into rented or some other temporary solution you're in a much stronger position to tell the gazunderer to take a running jump which is very satisfying.

It's certainly a risky strategy, as well as ticking everyone off, the gazunderer risks losing the property and also their costs incurred during the process e.g. legal & survey.

It's hard to mitigate against but I always think that if you're desperate to sell, don't ever convey that  to your estate agent, as that info more than likely gets passed on to potential buyers. You should be doing that regardless of whether gazundering is happening or not, as it will affect the offers you receive...

47 minutes ago, Moovart said:

It's my understanding that estate agents are obliged to put forward any offer to the seller made to them by the buyer. The decision to accept us up to the seller. 

That's correct. Some agents have policies in place to 'discourage' gazundering and gazumping, but ultimately it comes down to the morals of the buyer...

I once had some very grumpy buyers, I'd moved heaven and earth and compromised a little on price, was tempted just to tell them where to go and put it back on the market - I wanted to get rid but could hang on longer.  I bit my lip, and they sent me a very stroppy email which I deleted without reading.

Ideally we'd get on with our buyers and sellers, always try to meet them, and you can often sort out issues directly.  Estate agents tend to not like you have the other parties details.

I've generally had more problems with the ones I've not met. It can be stressful for both sides.  You often get an inkling whey you know that they may be awkward, and that includes going the other way with a last second increase in price when markets are moving upwards.  Again, bad karma!

  • 4 weeks later...
On 24/05/2025 at 23:23, Local Dulwich said:

Should Estates agents also take some responsibility for this. 

In our case it feels like they have been acting on behalf of the buyer not the seller even though we are paying then for their service. 

Just to be clear I have reassured the buyer whose house we are buying off that we still pay them what we promised.

When this is all over should I states which Estate agent is involved?? 

Yes please. I’ve had experience of this with two different local agents.  If a survey shows masses of previously unknown issues then I can see asking for the price to be reduced but not in the form of gazundering. I too felt as if the agent was acting for the buyer. What commission are they charging?

Its usually 1 to 2 %.

Say it's 2% and a house sells for £1million, the agency takes £20,000. The induvial selling the house might be eligible for £2,000 commission from that. 

If the gazunderer bring s the price down to £950,000, the agency takes £19,000 and the individual gets £1,900 commission. 

In those circumstances they don't care if you lose £50,000. They are only out of pocket by £100.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
    • If the Qatari's decide to retaliate then it's all going off...but I suspect the Iranians are hoping for this - one inaccurate missile and the Qatari's may have to. I think the Iranian leadership is working on fast-tracking their own demise and the Americans and Israeli's planning for regime change, maybe with the many political prisoners the Israelis tried to free from the Elvin prison today. What a mess but clearly Iran was becoming a big threat to not only Israel but many of the other Gulf States and was clearly doing scary stuff with nuclear weapons that required action.
    • I can't find any references to an attack on a British base. where do you find one?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...