Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 21/05/2025 at 23:52, Local Dulwich said:

Any views about this trend that appears to be happening more often!

Has recently happened to us and we had to accept a considerable reduction in agreed price for our property  (that was already well below asking price)

 

 

It's a case of who blinks first.  But  purchasers who do this will lose all good will form the owner and will probably suffer life changing accident as the Gods won't be smiling on them.

Edited by malumbu
Hypos sorry predictively tact
  • Haha 1

Should Estates agents also take some responsibility for this. 

In our case it feels like they have been acting on behalf of the buyer not the seller even though we are paying then for their service. 

Just to be clear I have reassured the buyer whose house we are buying off that we still pay them what we promised.

When this is all over should I states which Estate agent is involved?? 

  • Agree 2

It's my understanding that estate agents are obliged to put forward any offer to the seller made to them by the buyer. The decision to accept us up to the seller. 

If you're in a chain and someone in the chain has the brass neck to threaten to pull out at the last minute unless you take their lower offer, you're in a very tricky position and the gazunderer knows that.  It's a really nasty thing to do but a crappy person will do it to save money. 

That's why if you can be at the top of a chain by going into rented or some other temporary solution you're in a much stronger position to tell the gazunderer to take a running jump which is very satisfying.

It's certainly a risky strategy, as well as ticking everyone off, the gazunderer risks losing the property and also their costs incurred during the process e.g. legal & survey.

It's hard to mitigate against but I always think that if you're desperate to sell, don't ever convey that  to your estate agent, as that info more than likely gets passed on to potential buyers. You should be doing that regardless of whether gazundering is happening or not, as it will affect the offers you receive...

47 minutes ago, Moovart said:

It's my understanding that estate agents are obliged to put forward any offer to the seller made to them by the buyer. The decision to accept us up to the seller. 

That's correct. Some agents have policies in place to 'discourage' gazundering and gazumping, but ultimately it comes down to the morals of the buyer...

I once had some very grumpy buyers, I'd moved heaven and earth and compromised a little on price, was tempted just to tell them where to go and put it back on the market - I wanted to get rid but could hang on longer.  I bit my lip, and they sent me a very stroppy email which I deleted without reading.

Ideally we'd get on with our buyers and sellers, always try to meet them, and you can often sort out issues directly.  Estate agents tend to not like you have the other parties details.

I've generally had more problems with the ones I've not met. It can be stressful for both sides.  You often get an inkling whey you know that they may be awkward, and that includes going the other way with a last second increase in price when markets are moving upwards.  Again, bad karma!

  • 4 weeks later...
On 24/05/2025 at 23:23, Local Dulwich said:

Should Estates agents also take some responsibility for this. 

In our case it feels like they have been acting on behalf of the buyer not the seller even though we are paying then for their service. 

Just to be clear I have reassured the buyer whose house we are buying off that we still pay them what we promised.

When this is all over should I states which Estate agent is involved?? 

Yes please. I’ve had experience of this with two different local agents.  If a survey shows masses of previously unknown issues then I can see asking for the price to be reduced but not in the form of gazundering. I too felt as if the agent was acting for the buyer. What commission are they charging?

Its usually 1 to 2 %.

Say it's 2% and a house sells for £1million, the agency takes £20,000. The induvial selling the house might be eligible for £2,000 commission from that. 

If the gazunderer bring s the price down to £950,000, the agency takes £19,000 and the individual gets £1,900 commission. 

In those circumstances they don't care if you lose £50,000. They are only out of pocket by £100.

  • 1 month later...

House sale was completed yesterday.

Yes we were 'gazundered' by £75,000. 

Able to look the buyer in the eye when he came to collect the keys. He clearly didn't want to discuss any further, But I expressed my view to him that whilst what he did was not illegal it was immoral. 

What else can we do??

Apart from a law change 

  • Sad 1
On 24/05/2025 at 23:23, Local Dulwich said:

Should Estates agents also take some responsibility for this. 

Occasionally when this happens, the estate agent is complicit. Had this happen to our neighbour and we later found that the house was bought by the sister of the estate agent at the reduced price.

The agent is in an advantageous position as he/she is aware of the seller's circumstances and occasionally one will go rogue to do a favour for a relative/friend.

19 hours ago, Local Dulwich said:

House sale was completed yesterday.

Yes we were 'gazundered' by £75,000. 

Able to look the buyer in the eye when he came to collect the keys. He clearly didn't want to discuss any further, But I expressed my view to him that whilst what he did was not illegal it was immoral. 

What else can we do??

Apart from a law change 

Please name the agent and the company.  So sorry this happened to you. You could also refuse to pay the commission.

Naming the agent isn't going to help in this case, this is down to the morals (lack of) of the buyer.

I think it's always best, esp in a buyer's market, to keep details such as 'you're keen/ need to sell' to one's self, otherwise you're just giving the buyer leverage to pull a stunt like this...

  • Agree 1

Happy to name agent and do understand that there are procedures to complain. I believe that it starts with a complaint to the estate agent and then you can go to the ombudsman. I am very unhopeful that this will achieve anything as it will be hard to prove what the intention of the agent was. 

Also I don't want to name the agent at this stage so as not to open up myself to any legal issues. However it is an agent in the Village whish has many branches across London

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...